火了,全文再此
所在版块:心情闲聊 发贴时间:2020-04-30 11:25

用户信息
复制本帖HTML代码
高亮: 今天贴 X 昨天贴 X 前天贴 X 

Gilead Announces Results From Phase 3 Trial of Investigational Antiviral Remdesivir in Patients With Severe COVID-19

April 29, 2020 at 8:35 AM EDT

-- Study Demonstrates Similar Efficacy with 5- and 10-Day Dosing Durations of Remdesivir --

FOSTER CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Apr. 29, 2020--Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) today announced topline results from the open-label, Phase 3 SIMPLE trial evaluating 5-day and 10-day dosing durations of the investigational antiviral remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe manifestations of COVID-19 disease. The study demonstrated that patients receiving a 10-day treatment course of remdesivir achieved similar improvement in clinical status compared with those taking a 5-day treatment course (Odds Ratio: 0.75 [95% CI 0.51 – 1.12] on Day 14). No new safety signals were identified with remdesivir across either treatment group. Gilead plans to submit the full data for publication in a peer-reviewed journal in the coming weeks.

“Unlike traditional drug development, we are attempting to evaluate an investigational agent alongside an evolving global pandemic. Multiple concurrent studies are helping inform whether remdesivir is a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19 and how to best utilize the drug,” said Merdad Parsey, MD, PhD, Chief Medical Officer, Gilead Sciences. “These study results complement data from the placebo-controlled study of remdesivir conducted by the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases and help to determine the optimal duration of treatment with remdesivir. The study demonstrates the potential for some patients to be treated with a 5-day regimen, which could significantly expand the number of patients who could be treated with our current supply of remdesivir. This is particularly important in the setting of a pandemic, to help hospitals and healthcare workers treat more patients in urgent need of care.”

Remdesivir is not yet licensed or approved anywhere globally and has not yet been demonstrated to be safe or effective for the treatment of COVID-19. This study sought to determine whether a shorter, 5-day course of remdesivir would achieve similar efficacy results as the 10-day treatment regimen used in multiple ongoing studies of remdesivir. Secondary objectives included rates of adverse events and additional measures of clinical response in both treatment groups. Patients were required to have evidence of pneumonia and reduced oxygen levels that did not require mechanical ventilation at the time of study entry. Clinical improvement was defined as an improvement of two or more points from baseline on a predefined seven-point scale, ranging from hospital discharge to increasing levels of oxygen support to death. Patients achieved clinical recovery if they no longer required oxygen support and medical care or were discharged from the hospital.

In this study, the time to clinical improvement for 50 percent of patients was 10 days in the 5-day treatment group and 11 days in the 10-day treatment group. More than half of patients in both treatment groups were discharged from the hospital by Day 14 (5-day: 60.0%, n=120/200 vs.10-day: 52.3% n=103/197; p=0.14). At Day 14, 64.5 percent (n=129/200) of patients in the 5-day treatment group and 53.8 percent (n=106/197) of patients in the 10-day treatment group achieved clinical recovery.

Clinical outcomes varied by geography. Outside of Italy, the overall mortality rate at Day 14 was 7 percent (n=23/320) across both treatment groups, with 64 percent (n=205/320) of patients experiencing clinical improvement at Day 14 and 61 percent (n=196/320) of patients discharged from the hospital.

Impact of Earlier Treatment

In an exploratory analysis, patients in the study who received remdesivir within 10 days of symptom onset had improved outcomes compared with those treated after more than 10 days of symptoms. Pooling data across treatment arms, by Day 14, 62 percent of patients treated early were able to be discharged from the hospital, compared with 49 percent of patients who were treated late.

“These data are encouraging as they indicate that patients who received a shorter, 5-day course of remdesivir experienced similar clinical improvement as patients who received a 10-day treatment course,” said Aruna Subramanian, MD, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Chief, Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases, Stanford University School of Medicine, and one of the lead investigators of the study. “While additional data are still needed, these results help to bring a clearer understanding of how treatment with remdesivir may be optimized, if proven safe and effective.”

Remdesivir was generally well-tolerated in both the 5-day and 10-day treatment groups. The most common adverse events occurring in more than 10 percent of patients in either group were nausea (5-day: 10.0%, n=20/200 vs. 10-day: 8.6%, n=17/197) and acute respiratory failure (5-day: 6.0%, n=12/200 vs. 10-day: 10.7%, n= 21/197). Grade 3 or higher liver enzyme (ALT) elevations occurred in 7.3 percent (n=28/385) of patients, with 3.0 percent (n=12/397) of patients discontinuing remdesivir treatment due to elevated liver tests.

Key efficacy and safety results from the study are included in the table below.

 

5-Day RDV

10-Day RDV

Baseline adjusted

n=200

n=197

p-value1

Clinical Efficacy Outcomes at Day 14

≥ 2-point improvement in ordinal scale

129 (65)

107 (54)

0.16

Clinical recovery

129 (65)

106 (54)

0.17

Discharge

120 (60)

103 (52)

0.44

Death

16 (8)

21 (11)

0.70

Safety

Any adverse event (AE)

141 (71)

145 (74)

0.86

Grade ≥3 study drug-related AE

8 (4)

10 (5)

0.65

Study drug-related serious adverse event (SAE)

3 (2)

4 (2)

0.73

AE leading to discontinuation

9 (5)

20 (10)

0.07

1Adjusted for baseline clinical status

About the SIMPLE Trials

Gilead initiated two randomized, open-label, multi-center Phase 3 clinical trials for remdesivir, the SIMPLE studies, in countries with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection.

The first SIMPLE trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of 5-day and 10-day dosing regimens of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe manifestations of COVID-19. The initial phase of the study randomized 397 patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive remdesivir 200 mg on the first day, followed by remdesivir 100 mg each day until day 5 or 10, administered intravenously, in addition to standard of care. An expansion phase of the study was recently added and will enroll an additional 5,600 patients, including patients on mechanical ventilation. The study is being conducted at 180 trial sites around the world, including sites in the United States, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.

A second SIMPLE trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of 5-day and 10-day dosing durations of remdesivir administered intravenously in patients with moderate manifestations of COVID-19, compared with standard of care. The results from the first 600 patients of this study are expected at the end of May.

About Remdesivir

Remdesivir is an investigational nucleotide analog with broad-spectrum antiviral activity both in vitro and in vivo in animal models against multiple emerging viral pathogens, including Ebola, Marburg, MERS and SARS. In vitro testing conducted by Gilead has demonstrated that remdesivir is active against the virus that causes COVID-19. The safety and efficacy of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 are being evaluated in multiple ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials.

About Gilead Sciences

Gilead Sciences, Inc. is a research-based biopharmaceutical company that discovers, develops and commercializes innovative medicines in areas of unmet medical need. The company strives to transform and simplify care for people with life-threatening illnesses around the world. Gilead has operations in more than 35 countries worldwide, with headquarters in Foster City, California.

For more information on Gilead’s response to the coronavirus outbreak please visit the company’s dedicated page: https://www.gilead.com/purpose/advancing-global-health/covid-19.

Forward-Looking Statement

This press release includes forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Remdesivir is an investigational agent that has not been licensed or approved anywhere globally, and it has not been demonstrated to be safe or effective for any use, including for the treatment of COVID-19. There is the possibility of unfavorable results from ongoing and additional clinical trials involving remdesivir and the possibility that Gilead and other parties may be unable to complete one or more of such trials in the currently anticipated timelines or at all. Further, it is possible that Gilead may make a strategic decision to discontinue development of remdesivir or that FDA and other regulatory agencies may not approve remdesivir, and any marketing approvals, if granted, may have significant limitations on its use. As a result, remdesivir may never be successfully commercialized. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those referred to in the forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. These and other risks are described in detail in Gilead’s periodic reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including current reports on Form 8-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K. All forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to Gilead, and Gilead assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.


.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!

 相关帖子 我要回复↙ ↗回到正文
【其它话题】瑞德西韦数据出来了 乌贼的马甲   (184 bytes , 5362reads )
50% 的治愈率,random guess,用药一半能好,一半好不了 henryYang   (57 bytes , 10reads )
死亡率将说明一切 lgland   (0 bytes , 13reads )
显然这是希望的软肋 笑天   (31 bytes , 15reads )
看治愈率也行 lgland   (112 bytes , 15reads )
治愈率应该也是软肋 笑天   (46 bytes , 18reads )
可以看作两次实验 kusubudo   (58 bytes , 17reads )
歪个楼 有感而发 Tridenttt   (475 bytes , 22reads )
这个,去看这个 笑天   (52 bytes , 12reads )
Gilead成功了 -原来真的是政治 笑天   (135 bytes , 14reads )
PDF 这里 笑天   (70 bytes , 14reads )
不管结果如何 笑天   (18 bytes , 12reads )
主要结果 笑天   (58 bytes , 15reads )
OXFORD的说法 笑天   (209 bytes , 12reads )
各个高人都是牛人 rjm   (97 bytes , 12reads )
原来你在聊股票.... Calicocat   (14 bytes , 20reads )
股票和科学态度是两回事 笑天   (62 bytes , 15reads )
来了,结果自己看 笑天   (249 bytes , 25reads )
显然不符合常规的报告 笑天   (11 bytes , 14reads )
你弄错了,不是这个试验 快快跑   (833 bytes , 12reads )
比如tamiflu 对付流感这种。 Calicocat   (22 bytes , 15reads )
你帮某些懒人把数据链接都找全了 乌贼的马甲   (142 bytes , 13reads )
读了一下,这个就是最新 笑天   (32 bytes , 16reads )
另外两个也是最新的April 29, 2020 快快跑   (12 bytes , 10reads )
读吧 笑天   (39 bytes , 13reads )
火了,全文再此 笑天   (45766 bytes , 16reads )
另一篇全文 笑天   (11426 bytes , 12reads )
23号的报告(leaked)- 科学态度? 笑天   (30998 bytes , 6reads )
自己和自己比,5天和10天比 笑天   (113 bytes , 16reads )
副作用看起来也是有的 Calicocat   (39 bytes , 15reads )
我刚才搜了一下,才明白 笑天   (169 bytes , 9reads )
虽然我早已不需要做学问了 笑天   (60 bytes , 14reads )
佩服 chetang   (10 bytes , 17reads )
只能说五天non inferior 或者10天 non superior douknnowme   (0 bytes , 12reads )
这也是正面的表述,领导都喜欢这样的 笑天   (270 bytes , 7reads )
最新的数据不是双盲,是根据clinical trial得出来的 乌贼的马甲   (38 bytes , 14reads )
我猜测现在的重症患者没几个敢参加双盲的 乌贼的马甲   (38 bytes , 12reads )
同一天的柳叶刀 (4月29日) 笑天   (34 bytes , 15reads )
NIH使用金标准证明有效 快快跑   (216 bytes , 12reads )
你说的我同意,FDA本来就批了 -孤儿药的, 笑天   (4146 bytes , 28reads )
NIH的说法 笑天   (345 bytes , 11reads )
只有这个数据作为亮点 笑天   (842 bytes , 13reads )
可以帮国家和保险公司省不少钱 快快跑   (106 bytes , 18reads )
有道理,我只是在质疑它的科学基础 笑天   (346 bytes , 11reads )
外面也不是没有质疑的声音 笑天   (761 bytes , 11reads )
关于瑞德拉韦的背景资料-这个比较全 笑天   (202 bytes , 14reads )
其实有点同情gilead 笑天   (66 bytes , 11reads )
有错了 是 Ebola 笑天   (0 bytes , 13reads )
要是没副作用,拿来当预防的用也还不错 Calicocat   (26 bytes , 11reads )
我相信数据是真实的 笑天   (500 bytes , 12reads )
4月23号的报告 笑天   (718 bytes , 14reads )
数据说话,各自解读, 形势需要 笑天   (3935 bytes , 18reads )
Gilead server down 笑天   (55 bytes , 12reads )
都散了吧,这货就一爱崇洋舔美的。 18厘米的烦恼   (242 bytes , 12reads )
赞这个层主 ImHResIDeNt   (78 bytes , 14reads )
你这货又是哪一路的? 乌贼的马甲   (96 bytes , 17reads )
订单爆棚? 笑天   (58 bytes , 10reads )
我特么算是服了 茕茕白兔   (42 bytes , 26reads )
特效谈不上 alexwee   (43 bytes , 29reads )
建议了解一下吉利德公司先 rjm   (120 bytes , 20reads )
股神 Tridenttt   (63 bytes , 13reads )
看澳元今天怎么走的 笑天   (8 bytes , 12reads )
这个公司 Ke33   (51 bytes , 27reads )
前面中国也说了,效果肯定是有的,但不是特效,初期有效。 Calicocat   (412 bytes , 25reads )
同意你 宝狐   (41 bytes , 12reads )
当时双黄连股票还暴涨呢 Seabass   (8 bytes , 15reads )
有没有效,资本市场说明了一切 rjm   (104 bytes , 17reads )
对啊,有没有效时间会说明一切 乌贼的马甲   (296 bytes , 20reads )
世卫泄露的也是吉利德自己给的 笑天   (22 bytes , 16reads )
吉利德上报自己的数据给WHO 乌贼的马甲   (105 bytes , 16reads )
看新闻没觉得特别有效啊 Calicocat   (207 bytes , 23reads )
这个50%不是很理解 kusubudo   (45 bytes , 15reads )
是啊,没有对照组,很难说多有效 Calicocat   (80 bytes , 17reads )
编继续编 没有细节数据的新闻不是好新闻 功夫熊猫   (0 bytes , 18reads )
想看细节自己去找啊 乌贼的马甲   (22 bytes , 19reads )
呵呵 没有数据的文章多好编 功夫熊猫   (0 bytes , 22reads )
我也没强逼着让你信不是? 乌贼的马甲   (170 bytes , 19reads )
股票赚一笔我相信,这药有多神我不信 JeanGloria   (164 bytes , 18reads )
呵呵 列不列是一回事 列出来的数据可信不可信是另一回事 功夫熊猫   (23 bytes , 12reads )
你看,您太把自己当回事儿了不是 乌贼的马甲   (162 bytes , 12reads )
是的 女人衰老利器排行榜第一名就是懒 功夫熊猫   (10 bytes , 17reads )
那你可得多动一动了 乌贼的马甲   (8 bytes , 15reads )
泥奏凯 功夫熊猫   (12 bytes , 10reads )
不带中医玩,神药说你无效就无效 rjm   (44 bytes , 22reads )
在西医引入中国之前 nobodyknow   (32 bytes , 20reads )
是啊,电灯没有引进以来 pipi02   (43 bytes , 12reads )
张嘴就来 zamulano   (8 bytes , 42reads )