mismarking profit can be a serious criminal if it was intentional
所在版块:狮城财经 发贴时间:2006-01-12 18:16

用户信息
复制本帖HTML代码
高亮: 今天贴 X 昨天贴 X 前天贴 X 
i am no expert in this but look at what Nick Leeson has done to Baring Bank.

But its probably too early to judge this case yet. Even those on Wallstreet are having no clue about his intention. Some suggested that he was made a scapegoat to cover some bigger issue. Some feel it could be only a mistake in correlation input, because his action did not result in any loss from either his clients or DB. On the other hand, the shear amount (GBP 30m for a junior trader) plus the fact that it escape all internal control for 2 months suggest that things could be fishy. Well we have to wait and see.
.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!

You never know.
 相关帖子 我要回复↙ ↗回到正文
德意志银行交易员涉嫌夸大交易头寸(Z) fortitude   (595 bytes , 604reads )
mismarking profit can be a serious criminal if it was intentional 削竹   (598 bytes , 402reads )
So does it mean the DB controllers Dougan   (43 bytes , 215reads )