are brighter, but they are more provileged and have a higher chance of success, statistically speaking.
and GEP only represents 1% (or 5%) of the cohort, that is probably slightly higher than the chance that a randomly admitted neighourhood kid will turn out well.
again schools are not governments, they need to maintain their status as premier schools. i thought the point of contention was whether alumni kids will contribute to the school more than other kids? instead of government trying to level the playing field by taking away alumni prority. schools and governments interest may not be aligned. and yes schools need to preserve their "tradition" this way.
---
系统生成：由于楼层数受限，本帖实际回复的是 爱游泳的鼠 的帖子 “hmm time to sleep”
原地址：http://bbs.huasing.org/bbs.php?B=179_12358840
