morgan stanley和rbs该如何选择?
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 创业求职 | 本帖共有 15 楼,当前显示第 4 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:Aquixote (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:2) 发表:2008-09-19 23:14:17  4楼  评分: 
Stand alone IBs might be...
...a thing for the past. IBs usually have a leverage of 30 or more, a few folds of that of a conventional commercial bank. This level of leverage will be hard to survive the current market conditions.
MS has a leverage of 20 at this moment, which is probably the lowest for the firm for the past few years. However, they still need to hold merger talks with commercial banks like Wachovia, which has a lower leverage (10) and a much better buffered balance sheet.
Another option that MS is exploring right now is to seek more equity injection from CIC, potentially to a maximum level allowed under a minority holding - 49.9%.

RBS has also been highlighted recently as a potentially risky UK bank. After the ABN acquisition, RBS' balance sheet is still considerably weak. It is also very much exposed to the UK mortgage market, which might suffer from a spill-over if the credit crunch unfold further in the US.

Congrats in nailing the interviews and good luck to you.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 15 楼,当前显示第 4 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码