系统提示：该帖标题已被删除系统提示：该帖正文已被删除 [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [- (10-11 12:05, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]1楼
图
[shaokunlun (10-11 12:07, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]2楼
似乎歪曲了作者的本意Although this may seem like a small figure, the actual realised and unrealised losses would be much higher. These losses exclude any additional stamp duties, legal fees and transaction fees that sellers have to incur.
Also, it is highly probable that an owner sitting on a property below their purchase price would rather hold on to it than to sell and realise their losses, hence underestimating the number of unprofitable transactions.
Entry price key to profitability
So, if brand name developers, celebrity architects, and prime locations are not guarantees of profitability, what are the factors that can help boost chances of a profitable resale?
From the data, they tend to occur in projects where the initial launch price or entry price is reasonable relative to the surrounding projects. For example, Botanique at Bartley, which recorded 65 profitable resale transactions, was launched with an average selling price of $1,280 psf back in April 2015[shearwater (10-11 12:34, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]3楼
啥意思?93%都赚了? 啥意思?
譬如100个买卖交易，涉及买卖双方各100人。
93个卖房的赚了，那么另外7个卖房的估计是赔了，那么100个买房的是赔了还是赚了? 如果100个买房的中有的也同时是卖房的，他们又是赔了还是赚了?
[Sento (10-11 12:49, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]4楼
(引用 Sento:啥意思?93%都赚了? 啥意思? 譬如100个买卖交易，涉及买卖双方各100人。 93个卖房的赚了，那么另外7个卖房的估计是赔了，那么100个买房的�...)楼主是标题党 鉴定完毕 [本文发送自华新iOS APP] [功夫熊猫 (10-11 13:10, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]5楼
哪句写了93%赚钱 本座先去小憩一会回来发现没回答或者没有就ban全站 [本文发送自华新iOS APP] [功夫熊猫 (10-11 13:15, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]6楼
(引用 功夫熊猫:哪句写了93%赚钱 本座先去小憩一会回来发现没回答或者没有就ban全站)还小憩啥的? 不就是被老婆吆喝去看小熊猫吗?老实说，是不是去给小熊猫擦xiang 啊，哈哈哈[Sento (10-11 13:24, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]7楼
(引用 功夫熊猫:哪句写了93%赚钱 本座先去小憩一会回来发现没回答或者没有就ban全站)@留名呵呵你高兴就好 [本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [shaokunlun (10-11 13:37, Long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]8楼
(引用 shaokunlun:@留名呵呵你高兴就好)鄙视你打小报告给老师的童鞋
[Sento (10-11 13:40, Long ago)]
[ 传统版 |
sForum ][登录后回复]9楼
华新中文网 版权所有