Why don't pedestrians have right of way in Singapore?
所在版块:心情闲聊 发贴时间:2019-10-20 19:01

用户信息
复制本帖HTML代码
高亮: 今天贴 X 昨天贴 X 前天贴 X 
Singapore does have a unique situation on the roads. Unlike, say, the US where drivers in some areas (e.g. quiet suburban neighbourhoods) will stop to let pedestrians cross (even if it's jaywalking) or in much of the rest of Asia where pedestrians and vehicles alike wander onto the roads and pretty much avoid each other while accepting the right of either party to be there, pedestrians wait until cars have passed before they venture onto the road, and cars won't stop if they see someone waiting to cross. But there is an exception (see point 4 below).
Singaporeans are:
1. Impatient - given a choice to proceed or to wait, they would rather proceed.
2. Kiasu - they hate being second, and want to be in front, and also prevent others from being in front.
3. Bullies - given points 1. and 2. above, drivers will take advantage of a car versus pedestrian situation.
4. Selectively rule-bound - Pedestrians DO have right of way, but only under well defined situations, like designated pedestrian crossings (zebra crossings, signalised crossings). But Singaporeans are curiously selective over which rules they follow, and which they don't. Since this is the only situation where pedestrians have right of way, and they are also kiasu and tend to bully, they then take the opportunity to turn the tables by strolling across the road casually.
So don't expect right of way unless you are at a designated crossing. If it's any comfort, drivers behave the same way towards other drivers - impatient, kiasu and bullying behaviour within the bounds of the law.
In places where drivers stop for pedestrians to cross, there is obviously a different mindset at work. Pedestrians are treated as vulnerable, and the strong (the one in the car) should help the weak. There is less impatience, and "kiasu" is an alien concept. I found it refreshing when I was in those quiet suburban neighbourhoods in the US. Try this in Singapore and you will get a confused look.
.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!

 相关帖子 我要回复↙ ↗回到正文
请问各位老司机一个问题 HX3000   (667 bytes , 2349reads )
这种路口不是应该找一个就近的 qjkk   (38 bytes , 22reads )
人可以过但要让车 Daydayup666   (335 bytes , 26reads )
完全错误 笑天   (120 bytes , 34reads )
Pedestrians, etc., not crossing at pedestrian crossing to yield to traffic Daydayup666   (433 bytes , 25reads )
这个是解释啥是人行横道吧 笑天   (136 bytes , 21reads )
编继续编 功夫熊猫   (0 bytes , 12reads )
好吧 坡县确实不一样 笑天   (36 bytes , 16reads )
Why don't pedestrians have right of way in Singapore? 笑天   (1956 bytes , 21reads )
交警的回答 笑天   (906 bytes , 18reads )
所以交警的回答是 HX3000   (141 bytes , 18reads )
楼主不如公布一下是哪个路口 功夫熊猫   (24 bytes , 10reads )
请问层主的法律依据的出处? TPMT   (0 bytes , 16reads )
没看懂什么人行道修到马路边 吴越浪子   (65 bytes , 25reads )
我的理解:这样的路口行人可以过马路,但是车辆优先。 juliana   (525 bytes , 18reads )
行人有绝对的优先权 Erencie   (175 bytes , 17reads )
层主对马路边行走和横穿马路的区别斯不斯有误解 功夫熊猫   (0 bytes , 16reads )
还遇到过有行人走在双向车道的中间线。 Kitekite   (335 bytes , 17reads )
还遇到过斑马线不让行的司机 991ms   (199 bytes , 14reads )
遇到这样不礼让的司机只能心理咒他一百遍 yydy   (122 bytes , 11reads )
小区里的路 医药法规   (27 bytes , 13reads )
小区我无条件让人 991ms   (50 bytes , 11reads )
支持lz 下次直接直接把司机拽出来怼 我爱读书   (0 bytes , 17reads )
好像你理亏 BurberryQ   (50 bytes , 17reads )
我们过马路的时候,车根本就还在远处,也没有打转向灯 HX3000   (52 bytes , 18reads )
可能是想提醒你们不能这么过马路 BurberryQ   (48 bytes , 15reads )
我觉得可以发信要求lta加斑马线或者红绿灯啊 QQMM   (70 bytes , 46reads )
小区附近这样的路段有不少 HX3000   (154 bytes , 19reads )
楼主为啥认定行人可以过? 功夫熊猫   (0 bytes , 16reads )
不懂这种地方对行人过路的要求或者行人是否优先 QQMM   (26 bytes , 30reads )
没有人行道没有红绿灯 QQMM   (22 bytes , 26reads )
住宅区附近两车道的小路 HX3000   (109 bytes , 21reads )