不是income tax,see details inside
所在版块:房产车市 发贴时间:2009-07-09 11:48

用户信息
复制本帖HTML代码
高亮: 今天贴 X 昨天贴 X 前天贴 X 
Govt is proposing clarity to income tax law- anyone who sells more than 2
properties within 4 years may be taxed on gains from second sale onwards.
This will quell speculation and will take effect Jan 2010 if made into law.
Impact on developers- negative as it could spur a flurry of sales amongst
speculators before law kicks in. Here below is the article from ST.

July 8, 2009
When to tax property gains

A PROPOSED change to income tax laws will make clearer to property sellers
when they will be taxed on their profits.

Anyone who sells only one property in any four-year period will not be taxed
on his profit, according to a proposed amendment to the Income Tax Act.

But if he sells another property within four years of the first sale, the
profit from the second sale may be taxable.

If the proposal becomes law, it will provide certainty for owners who now
cannot be sure if the taxman will come calling after they sell.

Under existing rules, an individual does not pay tax on gains made from
selling a property unless the taxman decides that he is trader - someone who
buys and sells multiple properties within a short time span. And there is no
way for the seller to know in advance if he might be deemed a trader.

The new way of taxing property profits is one of many changes listed in a
draft Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2009 put up for public feedback last month
by the Finance Ministry. If implemented, the change will take effect from
January.

A ministry spokesman told The Straits Times on Tuesday that the proposed
change aims to provide certainty of non-taxation to individuals who own
property.

Once it takes effect, the individual who sells a property for a profit can
be sure that his gains will not be taxed - provided he had not sold any
other property in the previous four years.

If he sold other properties within that period, the spokesman said, the
Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras) will decide whether he should
be taxed, 'based on the facts and circumstances, no different from the
present tax treatment'.

The draft Bill can be read at the Finance Ministry website www.mof.gov.sg
and the public has up to next Tuesday to give feedback. The Bill is expected
to go before Parliament later in the year.
.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!

Put your OWN COOL signature here!
 相关帖子 我要回复↙ ↗回到正文
同事说房子又要涨了, 我突然觉得我前面的观点可能错了 aspernet   (284 bytes , 3095reads )
进来支持A兄,顺便给大伙贴张PROPERTY PRICE INDEX... lioncity_sg   (64 bytes , 1056reads )
A某很久以前就讲过, 当私宅的点碰到HDB的时候会有一个强势反弹 aspernet   (95 bytes , 519reads )
根据就是98年那次? 凶鼠   (153 bytes , 338reads )
这个index不同曲线的scale应该是不一样的吧。。。 凶鼠   (0 bytes , 247reads )
还请A兄指点一下未来的江山如何?往后这HDB价格的趋势? zaobao2003   (0 bytes , 273reads )
你从图上看, 按道理会有一个反弹后起稳, 然后漫长复苏的过程 aspernet   (112 bytes , 517reads )
这么说起来,最牛就是hdb... lioncity_sg   (167 bytes , 469reads )
等到condo和HDB价钱一样的时候? zaobao2003   (0 bytes , 295reads )
你的这个图说明95%要涨。大涨,再顶顶~~~我也在赌徒一个:) 雪狐狸   (0 bytes , 257reads )
HDB Index还能涨多久? zaobao2003   (0 bytes , 289reads )
起码跟着私宅涨到私宅的热潮降了 housewife   (0 bytes , 236reads )
就凭你的图,出来顶一下。:)房价的确狂涨了很多,最近20来天 雪狐狸   (0 bytes , 521reads )
是因为估价的上涨还是COV?感觉现在卖家要的COV高的很,很感要。 zaobao2003   (0 bytes , 231reads )
就看买家愿不愿意出卖家想要得COV. 我很迷茫为什么HDB一直在涨,但是大家的薪水 奥巴牛   (337 bytes , 605reads )
新加坡的公寓价钱和工资没什么关系,你看看那些买房象买菜一样的人 walktree   (68 bytes , 674reads )
中国大城市的房子还不是一样 housewife   (0 bytes , 179reads )
没关系,再等等,等海指涨过3000点再买不迟。 小眼儿   (0 bytes , 228reads )
that would be next peak.. freed0m   (11 bytes , 453reads )
全都涨 tinawang   (64 bytes , 509reads )
上帝说:“要使人灭亡,必先使人疯狂” HimaLED   (28 bytes , 507reads )
自从+1.2%的估计数据出来之后.... zaobao2003   (0 bytes , 315reads )
我觉得房价可能就会开始下滑了。。。 凶鼠   (275 bytes , 931reads )
呵呵 anniechen   (126 bytes , 675reads )
我是说不管怎么样,房子总量并不是维持原样,也是在增加阿 凶鼠   (70 bytes , 353reads )
替代组屋就是拆了旧的,总体上没有多很多 anniechen   (42 bytes , 353reads )
是不是clementi,buona vista,queenstown和redhill啊 icky   (188 bytes , 712reads )
dawson/BTO的一房式可以拿来买么?据知新加坡的一房式是政府拿来出租的。 freed0m   (0 bytes , 399reads )
也可能卖给senior citizen作为downgrade的选择 icky   (93 bytes , 363reads )
厉害,呵呵 凶鼠   (0 bytes , 225reads )
知识型选手呀 anniechen   (389 bytes , 447reads )
07年2月份,陈年老帐,哈哈 icky   (145 bytes , 343reads )
08年2月,说错了 icky   (0 bytes , 213reads )
这也是为什么这两年中介这么赚钱。 凶鼠   (0 bytes , 330reads )
马宝山昨天说,如果有需求,会建更多预购组屋 double11   (362 bytes , 661reads )
组屋供应失衡会加剧,每年有1万多对结婚,都住哪?没房能生孩子? 小眼儿   (42 bytes , 502reads )
就又回到国内那种靠房子剥削大众的路子了。。。 凶鼠   (42 bytes , 329reads )
大部分刚毕业2~3年的大学小俩口不用家里支援就能买400k左右的房子 sqtalk   (726 bytes , 566reads )
新加坡的家庭收入中线值不到5000块 blank   (200 bytes , 457reads )
新加坡。。不是大学生的还是很多的。。。组屋本来就不是为大学生准备的。。 hula   (0 bytes , 312reads )
你这一句随便的很多,害得我查了点时间来search sqtalk   (363 bytes , 513reads )
不可能把,就那么几所大学,每年招多少人数的过来的,我感觉poly都比大学生多啊 龙蝇   (0 bytes , 258reads )
degree holder是包括private degree的。。 hula   (547 bytes , 418reads )
你难住我了,我知道包括private,但不知道比例,呵呵 sqtalk   (479 bytes , 363reads )
420k这个合理的分界线是怎么算出来的? zhaoyu45   (131 bytes , 363reads )
觉得我楼下这句有点因果循环的感觉。。。 凶鼠   (2 bytes , 267reads )
所以房价涨不涨其实主要看政府政策了? 凶鼠   (36 bytes , 275reads )
8错,新加坡不是福利社会 sqtalk   (448 bytes , 351reads )
to 楼下: 人家那些是发达国家阿。新加坡可是没有退休制度的。老了是没有收入来源的 凶鼠   (0 bytes , 357reads )
price to income ratio ~ 6算偏高 sqtalk   (148 bytes , 354reads )
当然我本人没有任何预测房价升降的意思,希望不要有人被我影响 hula   (213 bytes , 357reads )
正所谓“远水解不了近渴”,预购组屋对二手组屋价格的影响有限。 hamani   (104 bytes , 536reads )
但如果政府把预购组屋价格和转售组屋价拉大,需求就会缓解 double11   (58 bytes , 351reads )
价格不太可能随意拉大的,政府要考虑对其他公民的公平,并且不能起到坏的示范作用 龙蝇   (0 bytes , 241reads )
对capital gain 收property tax应该不是个利好吧 SIGG+   (181 bytes , 447reads )
可是只是收income tax啊,收多少百分点? housewife   (0 bytes , 180reads )
不是income tax,see details inside SIGG+   (2250 bytes , 423reads )
不就是income tax law吗?昨天从头看到尾了。就是不知道要收多少 housewife   (478 bytes , 323reads )
property tax其实说明政府不让房价跌 aspernet   (47 bytes , 450reads )
为什么说是不让房价跌呢?不懂。 SIGG+   (0 bytes , 230reads )
政府需要钱....土地是新加坡唯一的资源了... aspernet   (18 bytes , 340reads )
同意A版的观点,具体不懂的同学请参照天朝国房市 liumama   (0 bytes , 213reads )
搞成国内那样难道是好事? zhaoyu45   (56 bytes , 242reads )
小新岂能与有特色的天朝相比? liumama   (49 bytes , 221reads )
加班加点印钞? liumama   (0 bytes , 167reads )
我还是觉得这是个利空 SIGG+   (189 bytes , 373reads )
长期来讲,因为通胀等原因,肯定都是涨的 偶然冒泡   (156 bytes , 502reads )
今天的BT有专版,讲的就是这个,观点和你说的很相像 sqtalk   (168 bytes , 603reads )