应该不行这种非婚生子，估计不行吧。孩子办出生证时，要带父母双方的IC卡，还有结婚证。你没有结婚证，父亲这一栏就没法写上孩子爸爸的名字，也就没希望拿本地护照。
如果每个私生子都能那么容易随本地生父拿到新加坡护照的话，那新加坡不得乱套了，这不是赤裸裸地鼓励婚外恋吗！
行只要在报生的时候,爸爸签名就可以了
Nature Father
那个曹什么不是有个上海女孩, 坡县都认啊
那个曹什么不是有个上海女孩, 坡县都认啊
行只要在报生的时候,爸爸签名就可以了
看到网友回复更迷茫了有说爸爸签名就可以拿到 也有说到死也没拿到
建议你打电话问CGH, 看他上海女儿有没有坡籍
坡县的法律实说,父母之一是新加坡人, 生的孩子就有新加坡籍, 那个不是坡籍的妈妈或爸爸就不一定可以因孩子的身份入坡籍
回复热心网友.这个规定是建立在结婚的基础上吧 妹子没结婚生孩子 虽然父亲是新加坡人但是小孩入籍应该不行吧
从现行法律来讲孩子是可以的,他/她的权力不应由大人行为而改变
建议到国外生,然后去当地坡县大使馆报--这是避免纠纷和麻烦的途径--不是教坏人啊.
拿EP来工作的妹子意外怀孕妈妈拿ep在新加坡工作，不小心意外怀孕。妈妈想把小孩生下来，孩子的爸爸是新加坡人，但是孩子爸爸已婚，请问不结婚的情况下，小孩可以拿到新加坡护照吗？需要爸爸去做什么宣誓之类的吗？
---
原标题：“妈妈拿EP来工作意外怀孕”已由 administrator 在 2016-03-07 08:08:03 时修改 ---
---
该帖荣获当日十大第1，奖励楼主25分以及37华新币，时间：2016-03-07 22:00:01。
准确的信息,请看这里--法律
LEGITIMACY ACT
(CHAPTER 162)
(Original Enactment: Ordinance 20 of 1934)
REVISED EDITION 1985
(30th March 1987)
(CHAPTER 162)
(Original Enactment: Ordinance 20 of 1934)
REVISED EDITION 1985
(30th March 1987)
回复网友..客户问题太多了 我整理整理应该可以出书了，十万个坡县为什么
主要是很多客户是中国人来新加坡做生意，有得的确有钱，有钱了就有这些乱七八糟的问题，也不会去咨询专业人士，在做理财规划的时候多多少少就会被问到
反正我的经验是真的不多，问到了我也不能胡说八道 想着网友人多 看看有没有好的建议可以给他们的。专业的理财计划我可以做，别的方面我也怕自己不懂，说不准 给人家误导～
用客户的资料出书,是严重的不专业,没有职业道德的做法
不要有这个想法
拿EP来工作的妹子意外怀孕妈妈拿ep在新加坡工作，不小心意外怀孕。妈妈想把小孩生下来，孩子的爸爸是新加坡人，但是孩子爸爸已婚，请问不结婚的情况下，小孩可以拿到新加坡护照吗？需要爸爸去做什么宣誓之类的吗？
---
原标题：“妈妈拿EP来工作意外怀孕”已由 administrator 在 2016-03-07 08:08:03 时修改 ---
---
该帖荣获当日十大第1，奖励楼主25分以及37华新币，时间：2016-03-07 22:00:01。
一个案例
A company director failed to convince the High Court that he should not have to help maintain an illegitimate child whom he fathered but never wanted.
The 53-year-old father of three, whose extramarital tryst with a sales director in the same company led to the child's birth, argued that he had disowned his offspring and should not be treated as a parent as he had no contact with the child.
But Senior Judge Kan Ting Chiu made it clear that, under the Women's Charter, the father had a duty as a parent to support the child. "To paraphrase the provision, a parent has a duty to maintain his or her children, whether they are legitimate or illegitimate," the judge said in judgment grounds released yesterday.
Lawyers said the case underlined the law on a putative father's obligations for maintenance and rules that intention is irrelevant, even if the child was begotten from a one-sided affair or a brief encounter, such as in a brothel.
The company director had claimed that his relationship with the woman had been purely sexual and that he had been outfoxed by her, as she sought to beget a child by him.
She countered that their relationship had been based on mutual affection and consent and that she loved him.
The man's lawyer, Mr Koh Tien Hua, argued in the High Court that common law and other statutes, such as the Constitution, treat the mother as the parent of an illegitimate child.
But the woman's lawyer, Ms Leong Pek Gan, referred the court to the Women's Charter.
The judge held that the Women's Charter "clearly contemplates" a man being regarded as a parent of an illegitimate child as well. He ruled that both parents were obliged to pay for the upkeep of the child and they should bear the financial burden equally.
"The norm should not be that parents contribute in proportion to their means because that will place unequal burdens on them for no good reason."
The judge found that although the woman earned a lower monthly salary of $5,200 compared with the man's monthly income of $14,075, there was no evidence she was unable to pay half the monthly $1,440 maintenance for the three-year-old boy.
To this end, he reduced the monthly sum to be paid by the father from $1,050 - set by a district judge in 2013 - to $720.
The 41-year-old woman is a divorcee with a five-year-old daughter and worked in the firm where the man owns a majority stake.
"I have never wanted this child and I didn't even plan for this," said the man in his testimony.
The 53-year-old father of three, whose extramarital tryst with a sales director in the same company led to the child's birth, argued that he had disowned his offspring and should not be treated as a parent as he had no contact with the child.
But Senior Judge Kan Ting Chiu made it clear that, under the Women's Charter, the father had a duty as a parent to support the child. "To paraphrase the provision, a parent has a duty to maintain his or her children, whether they are legitimate or illegitimate," the judge said in judgment grounds released yesterday.
Lawyers said the case underlined the law on a putative father's obligations for maintenance and rules that intention is irrelevant, even if the child was begotten from a one-sided affair or a brief encounter, such as in a brothel.
The company director had claimed that his relationship with the woman had been purely sexual and that he had been outfoxed by her, as she sought to beget a child by him.
She countered that their relationship had been based on mutual affection and consent and that she loved him.
The man's lawyer, Mr Koh Tien Hua, argued in the High Court that common law and other statutes, such as the Constitution, treat the mother as the parent of an illegitimate child.
But the woman's lawyer, Ms Leong Pek Gan, referred the court to the Women's Charter.
The judge held that the Women's Charter "clearly contemplates" a man being regarded as a parent of an illegitimate child as well. He ruled that both parents were obliged to pay for the upkeep of the child and they should bear the financial burden equally.
"The norm should not be that parents contribute in proportion to their means because that will place unequal burdens on them for no good reason."
The judge found that although the woman earned a lower monthly salary of $5,200 compared with the man's monthly income of $14,075, there was no evidence she was unable to pay half the monthly $1,440 maintenance for the three-year-old boy.
To this end, he reduced the monthly sum to be paid by the father from $1,050 - set by a district judge in 2013 - to $720.
The 41-year-old woman is a divorcee with a five-year-old daughter and worked in the firm where the man owns a majority stake.
"I have never wanted this child and I didn't even plan for this," said the man in his testimony.
拿EP来工作的妹子意外怀孕妈妈拿ep在新加坡工作，不小心意外怀孕。妈妈想把小孩生下来，孩子的爸爸是新加坡人，但是孩子爸爸已婚，请问不结婚的情况下，小孩可以拿到新加坡护照吗？需要爸爸去做什么宣誓之类的吗？
---
原标题：“妈妈拿EP来工作意外怀孕”已由 administrator 在 2016-03-07 08:08:03 时修改 ---
---
该帖荣获当日十大第1，奖励楼主25分以及37华新币，时间：2016-03-07 22:00:01。
一个例子
Q: Anyone know how can my child be a SC/PR if i not marriage to the child mother?
I am a Singaporean,mother of the child is from Vietnam..
A: If the child's parents are listed, e.g., you name is on the Birth Certificate, (whether you are/were married to the woman or not) and the child was born in Singapore, then the child is Singaporean by birth. Full Stop. If it's a boy, then the boy is liable for NS as well, just like any other citizen. If the birth was not registered in the mother's home country, then the child will not be allowed to stay there with the mother, should she split and leave the child with the father (It does happen).
各位大侠,感情规感情, 感觉规感觉,原则是原则,法律是法律. 一个基本点就是: 婚生和非婚生的孩子, 有相同的法律地位和权利, 不应由其父母的主观原因受到影响. 可以惩罚父或母, 但不是惩罚孩子.
I am a Singaporean,mother of the child is from Vietnam..
A: If the child's parents are listed, e.g., you name is on the Birth Certificate, (whether you are/were married to the woman or not) and the child was born in Singapore, then the child is Singaporean by birth. Full Stop. If it's a boy, then the boy is liable for NS as well, just like any other citizen. If the birth was not registered in the mother's home country, then the child will not be allowed to stay there with the mother, should she split and leave the child with the father (It does happen).
各位大侠,感情规感情, 感觉规感觉,原则是原则,法律是法律. 一个基本点就是: 婚生和非婚生的孩子, 有相同的法律地位和权利, 不应由其父母的主观原因受到影响. 可以惩罚父或母, 但不是惩罚孩子.
去海外生可以申请坡籍，需爸爸签字，ICA网站就有答案申请新加坡国籍的条件第四条：
Eligibility 里面最后一条：
Child born outside Singapore where at least one parent is a Singapore Citizen.
这种情况里的最后一条就是针对婚外私生子的：
An overseas-born minor (child) may be eligible for Singapore Citizenship by Descent under Article 122(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, if his/her parents meet any of the following conditions:
Male Singapore citizen by Birth who has a lawful marriage at time of minor's birth
Male Singapore citizen by Registration who has a lawful marriage at time of minor's birth and minor does not acquire citizenship of the country he was born by reason of his birth in that country
Female Singapore citizen by Birth and minor born on or after 15 May 2004
Female Singapore citizen by Registration and minor born on or after 15 May 2004. Minor shall not acquire citizenship of the country he was born by reason of his birth in that country
Male (who has a lawful marriage at time of (more...)
亲身体会, 我的孩子们报生时, 没有一个看了结婚证的
本地生, 本地报生, 只看双方的IC --那是10多年前了
孩子爸爸本身就想离婚好像不是这个女的怀孕威胁，我听她的意思是男方本身就想离婚 但是应该怕是在小孩出生之前不能办理完离婚手续 应该没这么快 我也不敢乱出主意 毕竟小孩也是一条命
如果爸爸本身想离婚,正好以此为借口啊
出生证签字也不会有问题, 无论将来是否和你客户结婚,都可以这么做
的确可以以此为借口离婚但是现在问题是 还没离婚之前，小孩是否可以在新加坡拿到身份，大人的事情 离婚早晚如果对孩子没影响 那就没问题了
按照新加坡国籍法, 并没有规定是否需要结婚的条件啊
没有任何一条和结婚有关.找律师处理, 应该没问题.--因为妈妈未婚,在原生国不可以上户口,也可以成为理由的
新加坡國籍法是來自新加坡憲法，原則是血統主義和經修改的屬地主義。取得新加坡國籍有四種方式：出生、血統、註冊或歸化
新加坡公民權首次授予於1959年，當時新加坡是一個自治的英國殖民地。那時，新加坡已被授予充分的內部自治。《1957年新加坡公民條例》將公民身份給予所有在新加坡或馬來亞聯邦出生的居民、已居住兩年的英國公民，以及其他已居住十年的居民[2]。新加坡人仍然被視為英國臣民，他們的護照有不常見的國籍身份：“英國臣民：新加坡國公民”而不是通常的“英國臣民：英國及殖民地公民”[3]。
新加坡與馬來西亞聯邦在1963年9月16日合併，所有英國臣民：新加坡公民當日成為馬來西亞公民。馬來西亞公民是由馬來西亞國籍法規範。其後，新加坡在1965年8月9日從馬來西亞聯邦分裂出來，新憲法生效。關於新加坡國籍，新加坡廢除了1957年的條例，並給予在1963年9月16日根據該條例是公民的人新加坡公民資格。
2004年，憲法進行了修訂，允許女性公民和公民通過血統給予在海外出生的子女公民身份。但要取得國籍，該子女必須滿足一定的居住要求。
如果一個人在新加坡出生時其父或母是新加坡公民，他將是新加坡公民。當孩子的父親是一個駐新加坡的外國外交官並享有豁免權，即使孩子的母親是新加坡人，該孩子也不能取得新加坡公民權。
2004年5月15日或之後在新加坡以外出生的人，若其父或母是新加坡公民，他將取得新加坡公民權。若該父或母是以血緣取得公民權，但該父或母必須在孩子出生前已經在新加坡居住至少共四年，或在孩子出生前5年內有至少一年在新加坡居住[4]。2004年5月15日之前在新加坡以外出生的人，只有當其父親在其出生或作出生註冊時是新加坡公民，才可取得新加坡公民權。
在所有情況下，新加坡公民海外出生的兒童只有當他們沒有獲得其出生國的國籍時，才被授予由血統取得的新加坡公民資格。
若一個人已是永久居民至少兩年，並已在新加坡就業或已和新加坡公民結婚，則可申請註冊為新加坡公民。男性永久居民也可申請，若他圓滿完成全職國民服役[5]。
雖然憲法容許，但現已不以歸化方式授予公民權[6]。當局以憲法中有關註冊的規定給予外來人公民權。
新加坡國籍法是來自新加坡憲法，原則是血統主義和經修改的屬地主義。取得新加坡國籍有四種方式：出生、血統、註冊或歸化
新加坡公民權首次授予於1959年，當時新加坡是一個自治的英國殖民地。那時，新加坡已被授予充分的內部自治。《1957年新加坡公民條例》將公民身份給予所有在新加坡或馬來亞聯邦出生的居民、已居住兩年的英國公民，以及其他已居住十年的居民[2]。新加坡人仍然被視為英國臣民，他們的護照有不常見的國籍身份：“英國臣民：新加坡國公民”而不是通常的“英國臣民：英國及殖民地公民”[3]。
新加坡與馬來西亞聯邦在1963年9月16日合併，所有英國臣民：新加坡公民當日成為馬來西亞公民。馬來西亞公民是由馬來西亞國籍法規範。其後，新加坡在1965年8月9日從馬來西亞聯邦分裂出來，新憲法生效。關於新加坡國籍，新加坡廢除了1957年的條例，並給予在1963年9月16日根據該條例是公民的人新加坡公民資格。
2004年，憲法進行了修訂，允許女性公民和公民通過血統給予在海外出生的子女公民身份。但要取得國籍，該子女必須滿足一定的居住要求。
如果一個人在新加坡出生時其父或母是新加坡公民，他將是新加坡公民。當孩子的父親是一個駐新加坡的外國外交官並享有豁免權，即使孩子的母親是新加坡人，該孩子也不能取得新加坡公民權。
2004年5月15日或之後在新加坡以外出生的人，若其父或母是新加坡公民，他將取得新加坡公民權。若該父或母是以血緣取得公民權，但該父或母必須在孩子出生前已經在新加坡居住至少共四年，或在孩子出生前5年內有至少一年在新加坡居住[4]。2004年5月15日之前在新加坡以外出生的人，只有當其父親在其出生或作出生註冊時是新加坡公民，才可取得新加坡公民權。
在所有情況下，新加坡公民海外出生的兒童只有當他們沒有獲得其出生國的國籍時，才被授予由血統取得的新加坡公民資格。
若一個人已是永久居民至少兩年，並已在新加坡就業或已和新加坡公民結婚，則可申請註冊為新加坡公民。男性永久居民也可申請，若他圓滿完成全職國民服役[5]。
雖然憲法容許，但現已不以歸化方式授予公民權[6]。當局以憲法中有關註冊的規定給予外來人公民權。
你误会了新加坡的法律，这个是针对已婚夫妇的而且孩子必需在新加坡出生。
报生的时候是要带上结婚证的。
我并没有误会
请询问律师及查阅法典
看结婚证只是行政措施
思考实验--如果男方,女方都是新加坡公民,他们并未结婚,生出的孩子, 或者双方都另有家庭,应该怎么处理?哪什么国籍?
1)不许出生
2)无国籍
3)处理掉
4)以上都不对..
呵呵
看结婚证只是行政措施
思考实验--如果男方,女方都是新加坡公民,他们并未结婚,生出的孩子, 或者双方都另有家庭,应该怎么处理?哪什么国籍?
1)不许出生
2)无国籍
3)处理掉
4)以上都不对..
呵呵
在哪里生已经成为了世纪难题新加坡生也拿不到身份，回国生也很难上户口 妹子没别的招了吗？
其实,(男女)下决心要生, 孩子肯定是可以拿到坡县身份的
爸爸是坡人, 只要他愿意(如认养, 办领养手续),孩子一定是坡县身份
再重复一遍, 新加坡宪法(国籍法), 完全没有提到婚姻状况--找(好)律师打官司.
无论父母有什么错, 孩子是无辜的...
再重复一遍, 新加坡宪法(国籍法), 完全没有提到婚姻状况--找(好)律师打官司.
无论父母有什么错, 孩子是无辜的...
华新中文网致力于为新加坡留学生、工作人士及华人同胞提供交流空间和服务平台
关于我们┊ 广告服务┊ 联系方式┊ 华新博客┊ 经典怀旧┊ 投递作品
Huasing Association 1999 - 2013
