我所知道的GEP
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 本帖共有 86 楼,当前显示第 26 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:randomwalk (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:198) 发表:2018-07-16 10:21:42  26楼 
引用美国Duke大学学者的研究Researchers at Duke studied SAT scores of intellectually promising 7th graders (ages 12 to 13) over the last 30 years. The figure below took the ratio of boys to girls who scored in the top 1%, 0.5%, and 0.01% of the distribution in math scores (girls have a slight edge on the verbal SAT, but the differences are not nearly as large). Up to the top 1%, boys and girls are nearly equal. But the higher into the tail you get, the bigger the differences emerge—and the boys dominate. In the 1980s, there were 13.5 boys for every girl in the top 0.01%, now there are only 3.8. The decline shows a large share of the gap was social conditioning, whether because of girls being told they could not be great at math or not being encouraged to take hard math classes. But a significant gap remains—some of if representing that we have further to go and some of it raising more uncomfortable questions about differences in innate ability. GEP 录取的是智商最高的1%, 男孩确实占优. 文章来源:  Men a (more...)
Where is the word IQ or Intelligence Quotient mentioned here?
图上面很清楚啊:math SAT scores of 7th-graders

你原图那两个bell curve哪里弄来的?分享一下,让大家读一下,看是不是你说的那个事。。。

huasinger都可以直接阅读英文文献的啊,这个你应该知道的
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 86 楼,当前显示第 26 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码