【少儿不宜】新加坡奖学金得主与新加坡的第四代领导人这是今天在本地投资圈看到的一篇文章。是一名新加坡奖学金得主匿名发在 quora 上的。
Do you think an overhaul is needed in the Singapore civil service in how we select our leaders (government scholarship)?
As a government scholar, I feel it is important that I echo my thoughts on this.
I attended the Integrated Programme at HCI, and proceeded on an SAF scholarship to read PPE at the University of Oxford. I then completed an MPhil in Economics at the University of Cambridge.
TLDR: Government scholarships in Singapore do a good job at identifying administrators; but administrators are not leaders, and should never be mistaken for leaders.
Scholars in Singapore are chosen at a very young age. I would hesitate to say that A-level performance is correlated with how competent you will be as a person because as many people who have went through the process know very well, you can do pretty well if you were born to a good family.
From the age of 7 through when I gradu
(more...)
神烦这种自己不行就出来讲别人也不行的文章·
整天拿美国的人才库和小坡比,讲创新言必steve jobs.然后就是小坡的教育不行。可笑得可爱。
领导人就要像老李这样的领导人?
其实领导人和老李一样的领导人有本质的差别。奖学金得主本来就是出来做管理者。
奖学金制度就是为这些管理者而设的。一点问题也没有。
讲句实话,作者自己烂就算了。靠补习而来的好成绩算了毛!还要出来诋毁别人。诋毁奖学金制度。
真心的瞎扯淡。
领导人就要像老李这样的领导人?
其实领导人和老李一样的领导人有本质的差别。奖学金得主本来就是出来做管理者。
奖学金制度就是为这些管理者而设的。一点问题也没有。
讲句实话,作者自己烂就算了。靠补习而来的好成绩算了毛!还要出来诋毁别人。诋毁奖学金制度。
真心的瞎扯淡。