别被配合造势的标题党忽悠了,BioNTech最晚六周内打第二针
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 本帖共有 1 楼,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  末页>>
作者:该用户已注销 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:110) 发表:2021-06-11 23:41:22  楼主  关注此帖
我来update一下我晚上收到短信了,刚刚book appointment。 现在两针时间都要间隔6-8周。 我选了间隔8周,上网做了一下研究功课,两针时间拉长其实产生的免疫力更强烈一些,所以其实更好。缺点就是间隔时间久,在打第二针之前相当于半裸奔,不过我WFH所以也不太担心多两个星期就会被感染,所以无所谓。
别被配合造势的标题党忽悠了,BioNTech最晚六周内打第二针

CDC官网文献写得很清楚,推荐间隔21/28天,实在没办法最多允许42天:The recommended interval between doses is 21 days for Pfizer-BioNTech and 28 days for Moderna; however, up to 42 days between doses is permissible when a delay is unavoidable. (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7011e2.htm)

 

但你可能看到过类似这种标题的报道:“Delayed second Pfizer Covid-19 shot produces more antibodies: Study” (https://www.straitstimes.com/world/europe/delayed-second-pfizer-covid-19-shot-produces-more-antibodies-study),“学术研究”好像言之凿凿,但如果点进去仔细看内容:

- ... After Britain moved to extend the interval between doses, Pfizer and vaccine partner BioNTech said there was no data to back up the move. However, Pfizer has said that public health considerations outside of the clinical trials might be taken into consideration.

- The study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, looked at 175 people aged between 80 and 99 ... Antibodies are one part of the immune system, and vaccines also generate T cells. The peak T cell responses were higher in the group with a 3 week interval between doses, and the authors warned against drawing conclusions on how protected individuals were based on which dosing schedule they received.


读完了文章感觉标题下得有点问题?Nope. 因为所以,科学道理——几天后,小王宣布了拖长两针间隔以便更多人能打到第一针的政策。(https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/government-economy/singapore-to-delay-second-dose-of-covid-19-vaccine-to-get-shots-into-more-arms)

欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 1 篇文章,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码