有点道理,我是觉得science 怎么会闲到去搞这种劳动密集型分析
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 本帖共有 2 楼,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  末页>>
作者:Blzrd (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:5406) 发表:2022-02-19 08:36:52  楼主  关注此帖
拖拖的标题党假新闻,不懂哪个新闻网站抄的1,原文根本不在science,而是nature medicine 2,研究的人99.7 %的人是没打疫苗的 3,假新闻的精髓:半真半假,断章取义 原文Other cardiovascular disorders included heart failure increase 72% 改成faced a 72% higher risk of heart failure
有点道理,我是觉得science 怎么会闲到去搞这种劳动密集型分析
。。。。。
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:Blzrd (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:5406) 发表:2022-02-19 15:40:32  2楼
分三类。没有入院的增加的幅度非常非常有限。没有标题惊悚。都喜欢搞个大新闻 The study’s enrollment period ended before vaccines were widely available, so 99.7% of infected veterans were unvaccinated when they contracted COVID-19. Therefore, the paper doesn’t address whether long-term cardiovascular problems may arise after breakthrough infections in already vaccinated people. (A new analysis tackling that question is now under review at a journal.) Another limitation of the study is that the veteran population skews older, white, and male: In all three groups, about 90% of patients were men and 71% to 76% were white. Patients were in their early 60s, on average
平均年龄60+这个亮了,干嘛不直接分析年龄80+的,风险妥妥90%以上
。。lol…..
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 心情闲聊 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 2 篇文章,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码