100-1就年轻人先1个人买下。
做贷款的时候加母亲名字,卖1%给妈妈。儿子没房所以没有ABSD,卖妈妈有房第二套但是只需付1%的ABSD。
这和版上买的时候就已经分好99% 1%夫妻两个人是不同的。
这人在调查的时候没有坦白(这时候坦白估计就是罚款而已不用上庭)
When asked why he did not jointly purchase the property with his mother at the outset, Tan allegedly said that he had made a hasty decision to buy the property, with the understanding that his family would support him financially.
Read also
Couple admits evading S$69,000 in stamp duty by backdating option to purchase to avoid new tax rules
He is also accused of lying that his family was unable to do so and that he had to add his mother as a joint owner to take a loan.
这个买卖核心问题是孩子没有支付房贷能力,相当于母亲买了两套但没有ABSD
那么问题来了,一开始99对1的夫妻,如果其中一人没有支付房贷能力,后来队友把1%卖给对方再买一套,相当于队友买了两套但没有ABSD,难道不是同样的性质吗?
如果夫妻两个人都各有支付一套房贷能力,另当别论。
如果夫妻两个人都各有支付一套房贷能力,另当别论。
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]