继续贴案例 ARX v ARY [2015] SGHC 55Google search 　“2015 Family Law – Matrimonial Assets – Division indirect contribution site:singaporelaw.sg” http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/case-law/free-law/high-court-judgments/15924-arx-v-ary-2015-sghc-55 　 妻子：直接贡献27-30%，间接贡献20-23% －》平分 　 46　　　　　As far as indirect non-financial contributions were concerned, the defendant claimed that she took care of the household and all the needs of the children, albeit with the assistance of the maid.[note: 14]　The defendant also highlighted that the plaintiff was absent from the household for about 40-45% of the time due to his work commitments and that she was the sole caregiver of children during those periods.[note: 15]　In support of her position that she made greater indirect contributions towards the household and children, the defendant highlighted various episodes where she had to tend to the medical needs of the children and helped them with their homework without any assistance (more...)