如怀疑某棋手故意弃权；下假棋，提出来讨论，那也不失为一件好事！！！ 心里有怀疑，提出来讨论，让对方有解释的机会，消除彼此的误会，那也不失为一件好事！好过暗地里背后中伤，那可更糟。
我个人认为bls的出发点是好的，如果怀疑某棋手棋品不正，应当提出来询问，查出事情的真象，那不是坏事。
我自认下棋至今，比赛从来不会无故弃权，也不会下假棋或感情棋。记得1989年某个龙虎榜的最后一轮，我对到我的师兄李庆先，他只要胜我，就可夺冠。一般的情形，既然是同门师兄弟，当然是让自己人夺冠。但我们的观念是：“靠别人施舍得来的桂冠，受之将终身引以为耻。”他也没开口要我放水，之前，我对他的战绩，从来就没胜过他。我们两人，非常认真下这盘棋，他那天的表现失常，让我开了糊，请观赏这局棋。
图：王英再胜李庆先
这盘棋幸亏我是下先手，如果我是下后手，别人一定认为我们在下假棋！！！
(more...)
下假棋 ? I believe that bls is not talking in this direction ......
since you bring up this matter, this is one area that the organiser(s) need to look into for solution(s) if possible.
This is also the reason for me to bring up 8 + 1 instead of 7 + 2 after 几度 asked the question of 7 + 2 or 8 + 1 for “瑞士结合淘汰一局制” but it may be too late to change since the schedule has covered 7 + 2 method.
In China, some events are using x + 1 method.
SIXGA EXCO may wish to discuss after 2008 event regarding 9 + 0 , 8 + 1 or 7 + 2 for 2009 National Open. Of course, it is almost impossible to find a perfect solution, I guess.
Huasing Association 1999 - 2013