下假棋 ? I believe that bls is not talking in this direction ......
since you bring up this matter, this is one area that the organiser(s) need to look into for solution(s) if possible.
This is also the reason for me to bring up 8 + 1 instead of 7 + 2 after 几度 asked the question of 7 + 2 or 8 + 1 for “瑞士结合淘汰一局制” but it may be too late to change since the schedule has covered 7 + 2 method.
In China, some events are using x + 1 method.
SIXGA EXCO may wish to discuss after 2008 event regarding 9 + 0 , 8 + 1 or 7 + 2 for 2009 National Open. Of course, it is almost impossible to find a perfect solution, I guess.
x + 1 method is pretty good.
Actually x+1 method serves the purpose of tie-breaking instead of comparing minor points
Especially for the women div, these years we can see 三驾马车 or sometimes even 四架马车 leading with same points.
x + 1 method is pretty good.
Especially for the women div, these years we can see 三驾马车 or sometimes even 四架马车 leading with same points.
x + 1 method is pretty good.
冰封万市何惧寒
旧事前尘化云烟
唯有菜香扑鼻来
有了菜,就有了希望~~~