2008年全国个人赛第4-7轮信息汇总
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 本帖共有 222 楼,当前显示第 73 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:卷心菜 (等级:17 - 华新水桶,发帖:11914) 发表:2008-06-16 12:05:30  73楼  评分: 
下假棋 ? I believe that bls is not talking in this direction ...... since you bring up this matter, this is one area that the organiser(s) need to look into for solution(s) if possible. This is also the reason for me to bring up 8 + 1 instead of 7 + 2 after 几度 asked the question of 7 + 2 or 8 + 1 for “瑞士结合淘汰一局制” but it may be too late to change since the schedule has covered 7 + 2 method. In China, some events are using x + 1 method. SIXGA EXCO may wish to discuss after 2008 event regarding 9 + 0 , 8 + 1 or 7 + 2 for 2009 National Open. Of course, it is almost impossible to find a perfect solution, I guess.
x + 1 method is pretty good.
Actually x+1 method serves the purpose of tie-breaking instead of comparing minor points

Especially for the women div, these years we can see 三驾马车 or sometimes even 四架马车 leading with same points.

x + 1 method is pretty good.
沙暴千里不言暗
冰封万市何惧寒
旧事前尘化云烟
唯有菜香扑鼻来
有了菜,就有了希望~~~
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 222 楼,当前显示第 73 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码