¡¾Æë¡¿ÐĺÏÁ¦ ¡¾Æô¡¿¶¯ Ïó¡¾Æå¡¿ ......
In end Jun 2008, when ÎòÈëÆå; considering to have new name, I mentioned that the concerns should be on the ways to inject new ideas after every few years ..
¼¸¶È in early July 2008 talked about ¡..¡± ¡.. ¾íÐIJË˽ϸúÎҸп®£¬ËµºÜ¶àÂÛ̳¶¼ÊÇ´ÓÎÞµ½ÓУ¬´ÓСµ½´ó£¬ÈËÊý´ÓÉÙµ½¶à£¬È»ºó¾Í¿ªÊ¼ÂîÕ½£¬×îºó¾ÍÏûÍöÁË¡£´ó¼ÒÒ»¿ªÊ¼¶¼ÊDZ§×ÅÈȳÀ½øÀ´µÄ£¬³ýÁËϲ»¶ËðÈËÀû¼ºµÄ£¬»áÓÐËÏ£Íû×îºóÕâÑù×ÓÊÕ³¡ÄØ£¿¡¡¡±.
Personally, I hope ÎòÈëÆå; is not following the trend.
Recently, I notice that a few new forumers are joining this forum with the purposes of ËðÈ˲»Àû¼º, talking the negative parts of Singapore Xiangqi without evidents. This is why I support the ʵÃûÖÆ, let people know your identity.
For quite many net names here, we value their different views even without their identities, but for a few of them (ËðÈ˲»Àû¼º), they think they can just talk nonsense without identities to be known.
In mid Aug 2006, I gave three written suggestions to SIXGA as below :
¡°1 ¿¼ÂǶ༶¸öÈ˽ú¼¶(°üÀ¨ÀýÈ (more...)
i think that it is unfair to say that...
Your claim <For quite many net names here, we value their different views even without their identities, but for a few of them (ËðÈ˲»Àû¼º), they think they can just talk nonsense without identities to be known.>
I think that there is always IP Address and there fore forumers MUST think before they act. If some forumers dare to say, they dare to face the consequences. So i think its unfair to say that they are talking nonsense as usually forumers would be very careful in what they say and make sure that what they say have reasons and support.
To only take part in positive and ignore negative views can end up in biasness in your future views, because you only consider whats all the good points and ignore bad points. A good conclusion is always based on factors of both good and bad side. And i think that as a committee members, i believe you know quite alot about SIXGA as compared to us. So it would be great if you can share your views in all areas. To benefit us forumers.
I think that there is always IP Address and there fore forumers MUST think before they act. If some forumers dare to say, they dare to face the consequences. So i think its unfair to say that they are talking nonsense as usually forumers would be very careful in what they say and make sure that what they say have reasons and support.
To only take part in positive and ignore negative views can end up in biasness in your future views, because you only consider whats all the good points and ignore bad points. A good conclusion is always based on factors of both good and bad side. And i think that as a committee members, i believe you know quite alot about SIXGA as compared to us. So it would be great if you can share your views in all areas. To benefit us forumers.