my first posting after ÆåÈËÉú ......
µÇ¼ | ÂÛ̳µ¼º½ -> »ªÐÂÏÊÊ -> ÎòÈëÆå; | ±¾Ìû¹²ÓÐ 44 Â¥£¬µ±Ç°ÏÔʾµÚ 11 Â¥ : ´ÓÂ¥Ö÷¿ªÊ¼ÔĶÁ : ±¾ÌûÊ÷ÐÎÁбí : ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³
×÷ÕߣºÌ«ÑôºÚ×Ó (µÈ¼¶£º3 - ÂÔÖªÒ»¶þ£¬·¢Ìû£º744) ·¢±í£º2008-07-24 11:41:26¡¡ 11Â¥¡¡
¡¾Æë¡¿ÐĺÏÁ¦ ¡¾Æô¡¿¶¯ Ïó¡¾Æå¡¿ ...... In end Jun 2008, when ÎòÈëÆå; considering to have new name, I mentioned that the concerns should be on the ways to inject new ideas after every few years .. ¼¸¶È in early July 2008 talked about ¡­..¡± ¡­.. ¾íÐIJË˽ϸúÎҸп®£¬ËµºÜ¶àÂÛ̳¶¼ÊÇ´ÓÎÞµ½ÓУ¬´ÓСµ½´ó£¬ÈËÊý´ÓÉÙµ½¶à£¬È»ºó¾Í¿ªÊ¼ÂîÕ½£¬×îºó¾ÍÏûÍöÁË¡£´ó¼ÒÒ»¿ªÊ¼¶¼ÊDZ§×ÅÈȳÀ½øÀ´µÄ£¬³ýÁËϲ»¶ËðÈËÀû¼ºµÄ£¬»áÓÐË­Ï£Íû×îºóÕâÑù×ÓÊÕ³¡ÄØ£¿¡­¡­¡±. Personally, I hope ÎòÈëÆå; is not following the trend. Recently, I notice that a few new forumers are joining this forum with the purposes of ËðÈ˲»Àû¼º, talking the negative parts of Singapore Xiangqi without evidents. This is why I support the ʵÃûÖÆ, let people know your identity. For quite many net names here, we value their different views even without their identities, but for a few of them (ËðÈ˲»Àû¼º), they think they can just talk nonsense without identities to be known. In mid Aug 2006, I gave three written suggestions to SIXGA as below : ¡°1 ¿¼ÂǶ༶¸öÈ˽ú¼¶(°üÀ¨ÀýÈ (more...)
»ÆÉÙÁúÊDz»ÊÇÄÏ¿ª´óѧÑо¿¸úµçÄÔ¶ÔÞĵÄÄÇλ
ÓÃÕæÐÄ»»ÕæÇé
»¶Ó­À´µ½»ªÐÂÖÐÎÄÍø£¬Ó»Ô¾·¢ÌûÊÇÖ§³ÖÎÒÃǵÄ×îºÃ·½·¨!Ô­ÎÄ / ´«Í³°æ / WAP°æÖ»¿´´ËÈË´ÓÕâÀïÕ¹¿ªÊÕÆðÁбí

±¾Ìû¹²ÓÐ 44 Â¥£¬µ±Ç°ÏÔʾµÚ 11 Â¥£¬±¾ÎÄ»¹ÓÐ N-1 ²ãÂ¥£¬Òª²»ÄãÊÔÊÔ¿´£ºµã»÷´Ë´¦ÔĶÁ¸ü¶à >>



ÇëµÇ¼ºó»Ø¸´£ºÕʺŠ¡¡ ÃÜÂë ¡¡