¡¾Æë¡¿ÐĺÏÁ¦ ¡¾Æô¡¿¶¯ Ïó¡¾Æå¡¿ ......
In end Jun 2008, when ÎòÈëÆå; considering to have new name, I mentioned that the concerns should be on the ways to inject new ideas after every few years ..
¼¸¶È in early July 2008 talked about ¡..¡± ¡.. ¾íÐIJË˽ϸúÎҸп®£¬ËµºÜ¶àÂÛ̳¶¼ÊÇ´ÓÎÞµ½ÓУ¬´ÓСµ½´ó£¬ÈËÊý´ÓÉÙµ½¶à£¬È»ºó¾Í¿ªÊ¼ÂîÕ½£¬×îºó¾ÍÏûÍöÁË¡£´ó¼ÒÒ»¿ªÊ¼¶¼ÊDZ§×ÅÈȳÀ½øÀ´µÄ£¬³ýÁËϲ»¶ËðÈËÀû¼ºµÄ£¬»áÓÐËÏ£Íû×îºóÕâÑù×ÓÊÕ³¡ÄØ£¿¡¡¡±.
Personally, I hope ÎòÈëÆå; is not following the trend.
Recently, I notice that a few new forumers are joining this forum with the purposes of ËðÈ˲»Àû¼º, talking the negative parts of Singapore Xiangqi without evidents. This is why I support the ʵÃûÖÆ, let people know your identity.
For quite many net names here, we value their different views even without their identities, but for a few of them (ËðÈ˲»Àû¼º), they think they can just talk nonsense without identities to be known.
In mid Aug 2006, I gave three written suggestions to SIXGA as below :
¡°1 ¿¼ÂǶ༶¸öÈ˽ú¼¶(°üÀ¨ÀýÈ (more...)
»ÆÉÙÁúÊDz»ÊÇÄÏ¿ª´óѧÑо¿¸úµçÄÔ¶ÔÞĵÄÄÇλ