2009年新加坡全国象棋锦标赛!
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 本帖共有 193 楼,当前显示第 106 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:棋一生 (等级:15 - 最接近神,发帖:3182) 发表:2009-06-04 18:52:04  106楼 
Learning from the methods used in the last 5 years ....... 11 + 0 method used in 2005. 9 + 0 method used in 2006. in fact, 7 + 3 method was considered before 2007 National Open but 7 + 2 method was used instead in 2007 and again in 2008 ........ For 7 + 3 method, assume players A, B, C and D perform very well in the first 7 rounds as compared to players E, F, G and H. After the first 7 rounds, the orders of ranking are A, B, C, D, E,F, G and H. In Round 8, all players A, B, C and D perform badly and ended up players E, F, G and H move into semi-final and promoted to Grade B, i.e. Round 8 is the most critical round for all 8 players. Personally, if we have times for 7 + 3 method, could we consider 9 + 1 method, if it is too late for National Open 2009, then how about next year ? I understand it is not easy to design a system to take care of all factors, but since we have tried 11 + 0, 9 + 0, 7 + 2 methods so far, if it is not working well this year for 7 + 3 method, may be we should conisder the x + 1 (more...)
经赛务组澄清:今年B组的赛制有点特殊,难以给予一个适当的名称!
今年B组的赛制,有点类似单淘汰,但进入第8轮的前8名位棋手,都会下满三盘棋,以决出8位棋手的名次,不像以往的单淘汰赛,棋手下输一盘棋,就被淘汰。
至于碧山君担心前7轮排名第5、6、7、8名的棋手,有机会击败排名第1、2、3、4名的棋手,显示出这个制度有欠公允,这点我不能苟同。第一:前七轮赛事过后的排名,还不能真正显示个别棋手的实力;第二:由于个别的因素,前7轮排名第5、6、7、8名的棋手,他们棋力并不逊于排名第1、2、3、4名的棋手,第8轮开始的单淘汰制,就是让他们有一个翻身的机会,证明自己的实力。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 193 楼,当前显示第 106 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码