Competition system for Division A
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 本帖共有 3 楼,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  末页>>
作者:大忙人 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:10) 发表:2009-12-16 20:24:43  楼主  关注此帖
说到赛制,我觉得7+2 太少,应该9+2 或11 轮round robin.
Competition system for Division A
I had been taking part the Division A national open Chinese Chess for so many years I feel that the 11 round swiss system is the best system.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:大忙人 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:10) 发表:2009-12-17 21:56:37  2楼
There are some good points there...[1] 11 Round Swiss System looks better at sorting out the skills of the players. Probably look bad only when you have a 1-horse race. [2] The knock-out rounds seems have a element of luck. Yet, there is no total reshuffle to make it completely based on luck. Instead it is 1vs8 2vs7 ... However, K.O looks more simple and exciting for spectator and to organisers. BTW, why was the 11 round system replaced by current 7 + 3? ----kurubear
good question
You put up a good question but no one from Sixga willing to give an answer so far.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
作者:大忙人 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:10) 发表:2009-12-17 22:25:49  3楼
说到赛制,我觉得7+2 太少,应该9+2 或11 轮round robin.
knock out system ( 7+3 or 7+2 etc. )
I do not understand why Sixga insisted to introduce the knock out system for Div. A and B after inplemented for 3 years. In fact , if we want to say " Fair" to both players there should be in 2 slow games and not one slow game instead for every knock-out round.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版所有回复从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 悟入棋途 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 3 篇文章,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码