昨天的50MA在3140,今天日本很让我意外。
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 狮城财经 | 本帖共有 44 楼,当前显示第 10 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:banban (等级:6 - 驾轻就熟,发帖:2772) 发表:2008-06-09 23:33:51  10楼 
大家慢慢品吧现在都很少谈盘子,因为实在乏善可陈。 房事、股市、商品期货、高通胀,周边环境的稳定,都是一个个深水炸弹。低通胀和高通胀对经济都不好,但是高通胀对经济的杀伤力更加大。新加坡通胀26年来的高点上,还是属于政府控制的比较好的国家了,10月份MAS才会开会,吾觉得有必要提早作出更加有力的应对政策。 马来西亚调高油价,会对新加坡未来的CPI再度作出贡献,很多生活必需品啊!柴油上的尤其多,最终肯定是消费者买单了。
hope this won't be ended by a depression,
even though historically it was.

in fact, i am very puzzled on the statistics on many macroeconomic factors. let say, global oil supply and demand,

1.last september, when oil was $110, some experts say, "oil is over supply with the provailing OPEC output, they just dun see the demand increasing"....

2. days ago, G-8 meeting complained that world oil demand has been escalating due to big infrastructure plan in china and india...etc, while OPEC still keep its output level unchanged for years.

3. last month, OPEC meeting debated that oil output is sufficient, price hike is due to speculators.

so, who is the hell telling trueth? if they all tell "trueth", which i assume due to lack of information integrity in global scale, then what is the hell statistic doing its job? then, where to get the most accurate possible information?
人非圣贤,孰能无过;知错能改,善莫大焉!
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 44 楼,当前显示第 10 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码