基本同意比那卡的判断，中国正是因为有了这种笔者才会落得现在的下场非常鄙视这篇文章的作者。说些的文章从头到尾没有任何事实根据，通篇都是些什么我相信，假如我是教育部长之类的废话，典型的国内“智囊团”做派。
反驳，讨论都接受。问题是拿出数据来说明问题啊，停留在文字上的反驳有什么意义和可信度呢？
说什么理论什么的都没有用，用事实来说话就好了。
－朗咸平2001年就在财经郎咸平里用数据分析说海尔，长虹有问题，侵吞国家财产，结果呢？一查一个倒
－2002年，他又说上海社保基金绝对不能入市，揭发社保基金问题。然后呢？前市委书记查出有问题了。
试想一下，他说这些，揭露这些想要做什么？想要出名吗？想要钱财吗？名是出了，可是大家还没有看到他代言什么产品，作什么广告吧？他发表的演讲和言论还是通过论坛和经济研讨等学术途径吧？
试问他得到什么呢？
－从经济学的角度来说，郎咸平在2005年就预言了今天在中国发生的状况了，股市狂跌，楼市套牢，外贸企业倒闭。个人觉得他最近的那篇演说：未来和下一代很悲惨，我都不想讲了,非常的精彩，绝对是朗教授几年来研究的精华。
－2005年，他说人民币不能升值，否则会造成外贸出口加工商大量倒闭。今年第二季度，国务院终于在调研后发现� (more...)
你太情绪化了，给你段话做参考
。。。
For years the financial services have been making stock-market
forecasts without anyone taking this activity very seriously. Like
everyone else in the field they are sometimes right and sometimes
wrong. Wherever possible they hedge their opinions so as to avoid
the risk of being proved completely wrong. (There is a welldeveloped
art of Delphic phrasing that adjusts itself successfully to
whatever the future brings.)
。。。。
注意最后一句。
ps不要让情绪影响了判断。
For years the financial services have been making stock-market
forecasts without anyone taking this activity very seriously. Like
everyone else in the field they are sometimes right and sometimes
wrong. Wherever possible they hedge their opinions so as to avoid
the risk of being proved completely wrong. (There is a welldeveloped
art of Delphic phrasing that adjusts itself successfully to
whatever the future brings.)
。。。。
注意最后一句。
ps不要让情绪影响了判断。
Huasing Association 1999 - 2013