谢谢,我明白你的思维特征了,就是说你是一个
serious investor with strong self-discipline and principles.
另外一批市场参与者,比如我,可能不是这样的,我们的思维特征是:
1. 概率: 这个母股是否足够好,如果它的 ROE 高达 40以上,PE 低于3,那么未来时间母股上涨概率与下跌概率差异是否足够大?
比如说,涨过 你例子中的 $10 的概率是否大过 90%,而跌过的概率是否少过 10%
2. 肉是否足够厚: 同样的例子,你看到的是 母股从 $10------变为 ----- $9.9 的情况,而另一部分人看到的是 比如 母股从 $10.01 变 为 $10.10 的情况,此时母股涨 千分之九,权证 涨 十倍。外面有狼嚎时,一部分人的见解是绝对不能离开羊圈,另一部分人的见解是,备好猎枪和火药,找好有利地形,干!
3. 跑道是否足够长:
你的例子中的跑道是 360天, 而实际上公司权证有一些跑道是足够长的,比如那些 2030 年后,2029 年后到期的,在长达数年的跑道中, 一个好公司竟然没有一次向上的波动, 几个 百分点 几十个百分点,这样的概率有多大?
新加坡发行的是美式权证,无需等到 到期日,在漫长的跑道上,只要有向上波动,就随时可以收获。
另外, 你说的 “Issuing warrants can sometimes signal that a com (more...)
I think i have said enough about the pros and cons of trading warrrant.
Just one final word: options exist for a valid reason. But from trading perspective, the first thing any sound trading or investing system must consider is “What is the risk?”
When buying outright options, no matter how many winning trades you've had, a single failed trade can wipe out your capital—especially if you're risking too much each time.
So, if you're "lucky" enough to win your first one or two trades, do remember to take out at least one-third to one-half of your profits. Protecting capital and managing risk is more important than chasing gains.
When buying outright options, no matter how many winning trades you've had, a single failed trade can wipe out your capital—especially if you're risking too much each time.
So, if you're "lucky" enough to win your first one or two trades, do remember to take out at least one-third to one-half of your profits. Protecting capital and managing risk is more important than chasing gains.