【房】国大研究显示HDB组屋比99年地契私宅更保值
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 房产车市 | 本帖共有 33 楼,分 2 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  2    末页>>
作者:花生豆 (等级:5 - 略有小成,发帖:641) 发表:2019-02-13 15:17:43  楼主  关注此帖评分:
【房】国大研究显示HDB组屋比99年地契私宅更保值

Old HDB flats weather depreciation better than condos: NUS study

They enjoy constant upgrading from the government’s Home Improvement Programme.

Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats above 30 years are able to withstand against ageing effects and depreciate less compared to private non-landed housing, according to a study by the National University of Singapore (NUS).

The study, which looked at the depreciation rates of resale houses from 1997 to 2017 using historical resale transaction prices of HDB and condo properties found that the differences amongst the properties appeared only after ten years.

Control measures were also accounted for non-age related factors such as housing size, type, number of housing units in the neighbourhood and distances to the nearest MRT station and the Central Business District (CBD).

Researchers found that within the first ten years, the depreciation rates between the properties were similar. HDB flats depreciated 1% faster than leasehold and freehold non-landed residential properties and were related to building age. After ten years, private freehold residential properties were found to have generally depreciated at a slower rate relative to private leasehold residential housing and HDB flats.

Once housing reached 21 years and above, the depreciation rate for HDB flats stood at approximately 3%, whilst freehold private residential property prices depreciated by more than 10%. Leasehold private residential property prices depreciated by more than 30% once they reached the same age.

“The increasing ageing effects of private properties above 30 years old is probably due to lack of maintenance of the building and its surroundings,” NUS associate professor and the study’s co-author Sing Tien Foo said in a statement. “HDB flats enjoy the benefits of upgrading efforts such as the Singapore government’s Home Improvement Programme that help reduce the ageing effects more effectively than private properties.”

He added that the ageing problem is more serious for private leasehold property owners who face both ageing and lease decaying effects, given that ageing can speed up the economic obsoleteness of older buildings.

Sumit Agarwal, Low Tuck Kwong distinguished professor in finance from the NUS Business School, noted that redevelopment schemes and subsidy grants of up to $50,000 for first-time buyers of resale flats further slow the price depreciation of older HDB flats. 

https://sbr.com.sg/residential-property/news/old-hdb-flats-weather-depreciation-better-condos-nus-study


该帖荣获当日十大第3,奖励楼主15分以及22华新币,时间:2019-02-13 22:00:01。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:花生豆 (等级:5 - 略有小成,发帖:641) 发表:2019-02-13 15:18:48  2楼
Old HDB flats weather depreciation better than condos: NUS study
They enjoy constant upgrading from the government's Home Improvement Programme.

Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats above 30 years are able to withstand against ageing effects and depreciate less compared to private non-landed housing, according to a study by the National University of Singapore (NUS).

The study, which looked at the depreciation rates of resale houses from 1997 to 2017 using historical resale transaction prices of HDB and condo properties found that the differences amongst the properties appeared only after ten years.

Control measures were also accounted for non-age related factors such as housing size, type, number of housing units in the neighbourhood and distances to the nearest MRT station and the Central Business District (CBD).

Researchers found that within the first ten years, the depreciation rates between the properties were similar. HDB flats depreciated 1% faster than leasehold and freehold non-landed residential properties and were related to building age. After ten years, private freehold residential properties were found to have generally depreciated at a slower rate relative to private leasehold residential housing and HDB flats.

Once housing reached 21 years and above, the depreciation rate for HDB flats stood at approximately 3%, whilst freehold private residential property prices depreciated by more than 10%. Leasehold private residential property prices depreciated by more than 30% once they reached the same age.

“The increasing ageing effects of private properties above 30 years old is probably due to lack of maintenance of the building and its surroundings,” NUS associate professor and the study’s co-author Sing Tien Foo said in a statement. “HDB flats enjoy the benefits of upgrading efforts such as the Singapore government’s Home Improvement Programme that help reduce the ageing effects more effectively than private properties.”

He added that the ageing problem is more serious for private leasehold property owners who face both ageing and lease decaying effects, given that ageing can speed up the economic obsoleteness of older buildings.

Sumit Agarwal, Low Tuck Kwong distinguished professor in finance from the NUS Business School, noted that redevelopment schemes and subsidy grants of up to $50,000 for first-time buyers of resale flats further slow the price depreciation of older HDB flats.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:qqdriver (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:2388) 发表:2019-02-13 15:35:23  3楼
人生短短数十年,该享受就要享受呀
本来私宅就是花更多的钱去享受的。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:mirage (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:2235) 发表:2019-02-13 15:41:22  4楼
楼主真好人
太喜欢这个研究了



哈哈哈哈
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:mirage (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:2235) 发表:2019-02-13 15:42:25  5楼
人生短短数十年,该享受就要享受呀本来私宅就是花更多的钱去享受的。
享受得起当然享受
享受不起还不能看看文章自嗨一下。。。
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:riskhunter (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:774) 发表:2019-02-13 16:02:06  6楼
人生短短数十年,该享受就要享受呀本来私宅就是花更多的钱去享受的。
为赋新诗强说愁
怎么不研究买自行车比汽车更保值,根本不用油的
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:mwddd (等级:4 - 马马虎虎,发帖:409) 发表:2019-02-13 16:25:58  7楼
为赋新诗强说愁怎么不研究买自行车比汽车更保值,根本不用油的
哈哈
好犀利
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:mirage (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:2235) 发表:2019-02-13 16:26:52  8楼
为赋新诗强说愁怎么不研究买自行车比汽车更保值,根本不用油的
扫兴啊
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:熊维妮 (等级:8 - 融会贯通,发帖:8850) 发表:2019-02-13 16:31:05  9楼
Old HDB flats weather depreciation better than condos: NUS studyThey enjoy constant upgrading from the government's Home Improvement Programme. Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats above 30 years are able to withstand against ageing effects and depreciate less compared to private non-landed housing, according to a study by the National University of Singapore (NUS). The study, which looked at the depreciation rates of resale houses from 1997 to 2017 using historical resale transaction prices of HDB and condo properties found that the differences amongst the properties appeared only after ten years. Control measures were also accounted for non-age related factors such as housing size, type, number of housing units in the neighbourhood and distances to the nearest MRT station and the Central Business District (CBD). Researchers found that within the first ten years, the depreciation rates between the properties were similar. HDB flats depreciated 1% faster than leasehold and freehold non-landed residen (more...)
请问NUS教授住公寓还是
HDB呢?请先自清一下。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:shaokunlun (等级:10 - 炉火纯青,发帖:7519) 发表:2019-02-13 16:40:19  10楼
请问NUS教授住公寓还是HDB呢?请先自清一下。
注意1997 to 2017 年数据
不愧是教授,试试看1998-2018,保证结果相反。
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:花生豆 (等级:5 - 略有小成,发帖:641) 发表:2019-02-13 16:49:57  11楼
More details from channelnewsasia

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hdb-flats-depreciate-better-private-non-landed-housing-nus-study-11237604

The study was co-authored by a team at NUS, consisting of Prof Sing, Prof Agarwal, NUS Business School professor Low Tuck Kwong and PhD student Zhang Xiaoyu.

这图表太吓人了. 


欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:qqdriver (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:2388) 发表:2019-02-13 16:58:50  12楼
这就是你们和NUS教授的差距
作为教授,需要考虑到社会影响,要营造和谐社会。新加坡80%的人都住hdb,如果教授研究出来发现私宅更加保值增值,那就会刺激到大多数人的神经,影响社会稳定和谐。教授研究的结果,要根据社会需要。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:shaokunlun (等级:10 - 炉火纯青,发帖:7519) 发表:2019-02-13 17:12:10  13楼
More details from channelnewsasiahttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hdb-flats-depreciate-better-private-non-landed-housing-nus-study-11237604 The study was co-authored by a team at NUS, consisting of Prof Sing, Prof Agarwal, NUS Business School professor Low Tuck Kwong and PhD student Zhang Xiaoyu. 这图表太吓人了.  (more...)
看到这个图,知道叫兽这个词怎么来了
它只比较了不同时期的价格,去掉了组屋和公寓的升值部分。
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:shaokunlun (等级:10 - 炉火纯青,发帖:7519) 发表:2019-02-13 17:20:05  14楼
看到这个图,知道叫兽这个词怎么来了它只比较了不同时期的价格,去掉了组屋和公寓的升值部分。
狮王碰线图和叫兽图孰真孰假


欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:shaokunlun (等级:10 - 炉火纯青,发帖:7519) 发表:2019-02-13 17:25:36  15楼
More details from channelnewsasiahttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hdb-flats-depreciate-better-private-non-landed-housing-nus-study-11237604 The study was co-authored by a team at NUS, consisting of Prof Sing, Prof Agarwal, NUS Business School professor Low Tuck Kwong and PhD student Zhang Xiaoyu. 这图表太吓人了.  (more...)
豆哥你是来逗大家玩的吧
不会真相信吧。。。
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:我是老万 (等级:7 - 出类拔萃,发帖:1524) 发表:2019-02-13 17:35:10  16楼
shafa
撕逼大战一触即发
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:花生豆 (等级:5 - 略有小成,发帖:641) 发表:2019-02-13 17:52:13  17楼
狮王碰线图和叫兽图孰真孰假 (more...)
有趣的是国家发展部长貌似非常认可这个碰线理论

 

 

https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/lawrence-wong-property-price-indexes-114624821.html

欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:小花兄 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:323) 发表:2019-02-13 18:08:27  18楼
帮顶
坐等大神来科普
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:yaoyao8 (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:4295) 发表:2019-02-14 08:57:16  19楼
国大研究在坡上的意义
就等同于CCTV在中国的报道吧
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:一棵大树 (等级:1 - 微不足道,发帖:548) 发表:2019-02-14 09:11:51  20楼
主要是前一段时间,由房屋经纪主导了一波组屋99年后归零的舆论,
试图引导大众抛弃组屋,多买公寓。
所以教授们用数据研究来说明,要买也要买free hold的,99年公寓还不如组屋呢
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 房产车市 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 33 篇文章,分 2 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  2  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码