从那里可以找到提高自己对象棋的理解（棋理）信息?Reference:

http://v15.huasing.org/wap/xbbs.php?B=123_11325385[kurubear (1-7 17:16, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]1楼

可以去读《庄子》。[几度 (1-8 0:04, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]2楼

(引用 几度:可以去读《庄子》。)《庄子》cannot find mention of 棋理 after going through 3x only...say things about how to be a better person.

Please advise on which section to focuz on.[kurubear (1-8 1:12, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]3楼

(引用 kurubear:《庄子》cannot find mention of 棋理 after going through 3x only...say things about how to be a better person. Please advise o...)哦《庄子》好像是7-8级的。你还是先看《孙子》吧。

[几度 (1-8 10:53, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]4楼

(引用 几度:哦《庄子》好像是7-8级的。你还是先看《孙子》吧。 )《庄子》 is it have 33 chapters with many 内篇,外篇,杂篇? 《孙子》...and 8-12 others china-based art of war by past military generals/advisors we have gone through. But we only managed to consolidated around 30% while we find other art of war info by American, French and other non-china-based military experts to make it more comprehensive. Should be done by 2012 or 2015.

On the same note, our 中国象棋棋规 consolidation effort should have its 1st draft before end of 2010.[kurubear (1-8 13:14, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]5楼

(引用 kurubear:《庄子》 is it have 33 chapters with many 内篇,外篇,杂篇? 《孙子》...and 8-12 others china-based art of war by past military gen...)庄子的哲学似乎并不适合你庄孙子的哲学倒是很适合[洛三儿 (1-8 17:36, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]6楼

(引用 洛三儿:庄子的哲学似乎并不适合你庄孙子的哲学倒是很适合)Who is 庄孙子? He also write on 棋理?[kurubear (1-8 17:38, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]7楼

(引用 洛三儿:庄子的哲学似乎并不适合你庄孙子的哲学倒是很适合)果然高深，能有效结合庄子道家和孙子兵法，庄孙子之学真乃无敌！[逢人让双马 (1-8 18:14, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]8楼

(引用 洛三儿:庄子的哲学似乎并不适合你庄孙子的哲学倒是很适合)不要乱说庄孙子的哲学是逢人让双马的独门秘笈，别人学不来的。

[几度 (1-8 18:27, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]9楼

(引用 逢人让双马:果然高深，能有效结合庄子道家和孙子兵法，庄孙子之学真乃无敌！)A bit hard...In XQ context,
the 1st is more about playing a primarily draw mindset using trades, chess rules or draw end-game endings.


The 2nd is an attack mindset through making kill moves, expanding leads, neutralising the materials, exploiting weakness in formation or position or mental weakness of opponents. Only result is win/lose , no draw option.


If do both at same time can result in 精神混淆. In practice, it is hard to switch from one to another within the same game as can be seen in many games.[kurubear (1-8 18:29, Long long ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]10楼