(引用 Spring:在不知道03/04年回报率的情况下这题缺条件，解不出来)你是对的，所以有以前收益一样的假定。也就是假定03/04到22/23的收益是一样的。当然看新闻里的曲线，03/04的收益应该比平均高，但是也搞不了多少。所以去年收益大跌的结论基本可以维持不变。

这个新闻，就和当年老蒋的，国军千里转进，共军追赶不及，有一拼。[qingni2 (7-25 10:33, 4 months ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]21楼

(引用 pymess:哎呀，这刻薄干啥。。大家又都不是经济学家或者数学家。。人家问的不就是算的对不对嘛。普通人可能根本没法知道他们那么多资产到底咋个算...)好吧 你说得对这个回报率是模型计算的结果，通胀是要反应在折扣率里的
投资机构算回报，不是数硬币，12345，是有会计准则的
当然，如果屁民认为是作假，或者文过饰非，那我也无发可缩 　[本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [萧武达 (7-26 11:52, 4 months ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]22楼

这几天买put，都是百分之几百没有拿出来嘚瑟下？ 　[本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [萧武达 (7-26 11:58, 4 months ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]23楼

(引用 qingni2:通胀谁受益？大资金还是小散户？普通民众还是大资本？不要用小散户的思维去看大资金。如果0通胀，gic的业绩只能更差。)这是哪跟哪？雾水一头 　[本文发送自华新手机Wap版] [萧武达 (7-26 13:47, 4 months ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]24楼

(引用 萧武达:好吧 你说得对这个回报率是模型计算的结果，通胀是要反应在折扣率里的 投资机构算回报，不是数硬币，12345，是有会计准则的 当然，如果屁...)是，GIC肯定不可能在数据上造假了，就是一种presentation skills.他这个新闻让我想起了William O'Neil 书里的一段话：

Have you ever read a corporation's quarterly earnings report that stated, "We had a terrible first three months. Prospects for our Company are turn- ing down due to inefficiencies in the home office. Our competition just came out with a better product, which will adversely affect our sales. Furthermore, we are losing our shirt on the new midwestern Operation, which was a real blunder on management's part."

No! Here's what you see：

"Greatshakes Corporation reports record sales of $7.2 million versus $6 million (+ 20%) for the quarter ended March
31." If you own their stock, this is wonderful news. You certainly are not going to be disappointed. You think this is a fine Company (otherwise you wouldn't own its stock), and the report confirms your thinking.

咱们这一群理工男看到了数字游戏，就激动，说白了还是爱做题。哈哈
[pymess (7-26 16:53, 4 months ago)] [ 传统版 | sForum ][登录后回复]25楼