Thanks, but the most important thing is
所在版块：求学狮城 发贴时间：2007-09-08 09:29

用户信息
复制本帖HTML代码
高亮: 今天贴 X 昨天贴 X 前天贴 X 
Geometrical method is useful but limited to 3 variables (and for 3 variables it is not so obvious to see it). Thus some analytical or at least numerical solution is needed.
.
欢迎来到华新中文网，踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!

最新推出专栏《倾听索罗斯》 欢迎大家前来捧场！

Yeah!
　相关帖子 我要回复↙ ↗回到正文
请教一个简单的不等式问题 － 香陵居士 　2007-08-31 16:06 (518 bytes , 719reads )
2. － bugzzj 　2007-09-24 18:30 (77 bytes , 377reads )
1. － bugzzj 　2007-09-24 18:09 (76 bytes , 307reads )
please explain your notation － icky 　2007-08-31 17:53 (405 bytes , 303reads )
Sorry... so many typos... － 香陵居士 　2007-08-31 18:18 (276 bytes , 394reads )
I think the examples in 3 can still be treated as linear. － bugzzj 　2007-09-25 10:26 (236 bytes , 366reads )
i'm still confused － icky 　2007-09-06 12:40 (100 bytes , 315reads )
It simply says if each element of X is a function of variable t － 香陵居士 　2007-09-06 15:05 (46 bytes , 256reads )
this is not easy, even for linear function of t － icky 　2007-09-06 17:22 (66 bytes , 246reads )
i mean － icky 　2007-09-06 17:22 (68 bytes , 266reads )
I do understand what you mean but what's tricky here is that － 香陵居士 　2007-09-06 22:34 (120 bytes , 280reads )
if A is positive definite, then Ax > B eq to x > A^-1 B － icky 　2007-09-06 23:49 (0 bytes , 283reads )
... Can you prove that? － 香陵居士 　2007-09-07 02:00 (319 bytes , 262reads )
Thanks, but the most important thing is － 香陵居士 　2007-09-08 09:29 (173 bytes , 256reads )
aiyah.... － icky 　2007-09-08 01:40 (114 bytes , 244reads )
As I described － 香陵居士 　2007-09-08 00:19 (161 bytes , 269reads )
how do u define your AX > B ? AX is a vector, B is also a vector － icky 　2007-09-07 17:23 (117 bytes , 290reads )
oh, ok, you are saying vectors can not be compared directly － icky 　2007-09-07 12:38 (0 bytes , 261reads )