不过看火锅的帖子讲的明白，他拿到了新RC的EM.千万不要误导啊。报名时，学校是根据信上讲的GRC来决定资格的。AM是拿不到信的。

我也很纠结这个问题所以当初一再确认，当然这不是我的一手经验，澄清什么的轮不到我，只负责搬运XD


---
系统生成：由于楼层数受限，本帖实际回复的是 云云12 的帖子 “我吓了一跳。”
原地址：http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=172_13369029

几公里都可以吧！

以前没有中学的jc搞中学jc直通车，很不靠谱，不如那种中学jc合并搞直通车的。

知道有人在国初直通车，觉得中学低年级的办学底子不够。

万一2a2人多呢

4 in 10 at top primary schools live in HDB flats

That is half the national average of eight in 10 pupils for all primary schools. -ST
Goh Chin Lian

Thu, Nov 15, 2012
The Straits Times

SINGAPORE - Four in 10 pupils from several of Singapore's top primary schools live in Housing Board flats.

That is half the national average of eight in 10 pupils for all primary schools, Education Minister Heng Swee Keat revealed in a written answer to Parliament on Tuesday.

Mr Seah Kian Peng (Marine Parade GRC) had asked about the housing of pupils in six top primary schools: Raffles Girls', Methodist Girls', Henry Park, Anglo-Chinese School (Primary), Nanyang and Tao Nan.

He wanted to know how their figures compared nationally and with neighbourhood schools.

Mr Heng said their 40 per cent figure "broadly reflects the mix of residential housing in the vicinity of these schools".

The average proportion of HDB resident households in the designated planning areas where these schools are located is 35 per cent, the ministry said later.

Tao Nan is in Marine Parade, ACS (Primary) in Novena and the remaining four in Bukit Timah.

Mr Heng did not give the comparative figures for neighbourhood schools.

"MOE does not have a definition of 'neighbourhood schools'," he said.

The ministry has been advocating the notion of seeing every school as a good one, rather than encouraging such distinctions.

During a visit to Raffles Girls' Primary School and Punggol Primary School two years ago, former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew noted that what differentiated the two schools were the parents' different backgrounds rather than their facilities.

He also argued that the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) levels the playing field.

A scheme which admits students to a secondary school based on their strengths in certain niche areas, instead of PSLE results, was questioned by Nominated MP Mary Liew.

She asked if there could be a cap or scrapping of the direct school admission scheme "to ensure equal opportunities".

In a written reply, Mr Heng said autonomous schools offering the Integrated Programme (IP) where students skip the O levels admitted between 25 and 40 per cent of IP students through the scheme last year, even though they are free to admit more.

Admissions by autonomous schools offering the O-level programme are capped at 10 per cent.

He defended the scheme, saying that it has "served to broaden the definition of success and promote holistic education by reducing the emphasis on national examination results".

Raffles Girls', Methodist Girls', Henry Park, Anglo-Chinese School (Primary), Nanyang and Tao Nan.

注意看信的开头注明给Associate Member，当然这封信和新家EM status有没有关系我不知道，准备走这条路的，应该自担风险了，行不通也尽力了
---------------------------------------
http://bbs.huasing.net/sForum/bbs.php?B=179_13150424

更新一下：今天有收到旧家那边CC寄来信
上面写着：
Dear XXX
Associate Member
XXX RC

We are pleased to inform you that based on the prevailing MOE Primary One Registration Framework, You child is eligible for Phase 2B admission to Primary One at any of the schools in XXX GRC where you serve and in XXX GRC where you reside.
[本文发送自华新iOS APP]
---------------------------------------

---
系统生成：由于楼层数受限，本帖实际回复的是 云云12 的帖子 “我吓了一跳。”
原地址：http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=172_13369029

这And到底是指两个地方任何一个都可以，还是必须同时满足两个条件？据我两年前为孩子报名的经验，登陆到PA网上，所在RC的GRC 和 家庭地址都会显示，并且不能更改。这些信息都会最终打印到资格信中。到学校报名，学校第一件事就是看资格信的GRC, 然后查家庭住址是否一公里。GRC不在学校所属GRC, 根本没资格申请。其实学校有一个名单，列有所以符合资格的GRC的人名。
据我跟CC managers 打交道的经验，我发现Cc的officer 很多并不清楚这些。他们可能把RC em跟ccc members弄混。 ccc members 是可以在住家和GRC中任选的。

---
系统生成：由于楼层数受限，本帖实际回复的是 武汉伢 的帖子 “再继续人工搬运”
原地址：http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=172_13369055

好在发现目标学校跟目标家在一个GRC，松了一口气。

即住址所在和serving grc，并没有特指ccc或ccmc，只不过rc和nc的em通常这两者是同一个。所以问题的根本还是在于am是否够资格，如果am不够格，逻辑上等同于只有ccc和ccmc可选两个grc的学校。如果am符合资格，那am也会有潜在两个备选grc，楼上提出的几点也就不是什么问题了
cc的员工搞不清楚不奇怪，可是信是pa出的，要是也搞错…那就错吧反正学校承认

手痒回最后一次，毕竟我还没有拿到信，万一说错误导人就不好了


---
系统生成：由于楼层数受限，本帖实际回复的是 云云12 的帖子 “这封信很有奇异性。”
原地址：http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=172_13369094

看来下次RC会议，必须亲自询问cc manager了。这影响太大了！这以后在哪做义工，完全无所谓了。大家都被pa 的system 玩了！！

---
系统生成：由于楼层数受限，本帖实际回复的是 武汉伢 的帖子 “在明年以前，只要是满足条件的grl都是可选两个grc的”
原地址：http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=172_13369108

买房之前一定要确认房子和目标小学在同一个GRC/SMC，否则是无法通过做社区义工参加Phase 2b报名的，去学校所在GRC做了义工也是白做的！

我就是这样的，以旧家RC的Associate Member的身份参与新家所在GRC里名校的2b报名，小孩没有抽签就录上了。

普通邻里小学考入好一点的直通中学的比例大概多少呢？
难道就一两个学霸考得上吗？
我心中理想的小学是注重学业，应试为主，毕竟还是会考分数说了算。cca不需要很高大上，但是每个感兴趣的小孩都有计划尝试，而不是学校为了拼名誉拼奖项就不让没经验的小孩加入社团。

报名和我是否是新家RC的EM毫无关系，贴上我的Phase 2b报名时义工证明信给大家看看，就明白了。Associate Member也是GRL！
--- 系统生成：由于楼层数受限，本帖实际回复的是 云云12 的帖子 “我吓了一跳。” 原地址：http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=172_13369029

这是强制性的，没有商量余地。

这个信息很重要啊。看来跟我当年的政策不一样啊。我当年问过MOE, 答复是必须em, 而且RC所在的GRC 必须是和学校一样。
如果这个政策是适应于所有AM,那真是大变化啊。我会跟PA确定的，排除层主在住地em的原因。

---
系统生成：由于楼层数受限，本帖实际回复的是 喜欢吃火锅 的帖子 “我是以旧家RC的AM身份参与新家GRC内小学的2b报名的。”
原地址：http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=172_13369166