为了指出所谓的种子队，一定要在两组里面各挑两队，似乎不对吧？棋手名单我没有（说来惭愧，连赛制我也是从华新得知的），但如果就事论事，文礼、北斗、波那维斯达和白沙东都是强队，义顺南这次亦强亦弱。如果要说前四名的争夺，两组各挑三队机会最高的，比较容易。如果一定要说两队，那就近于博彩了。

其实这个比赛比分发生意外的可能性也也相当高，因为连续不停的比赛很容易影响棋手的发挥。候补的强弱，很有关系。这个比赛不限级，因此原本甲级不多的队比较吃亏。但结果好像是并没有太多队派全甲级，所以象碧山这样的队，（我猜想）属于甲乙混合，而且候补实力不逊于正选，实际上似弱不弱。种子棋队，说的是某些棋手的名气，还是全队临场的表现呢？

种子队的选取如果是为了赛务，让赛务处决定吧。选出的种子队，不代表我的意见。

As long as this does not cause a lot conflicts, more teams will mean more chances for players to play. Maintaining a club isn't easy, so we need not expect one to participate in all tournaments.

Forming 2 teams at Christmas period is difficult. Some more it's wierd if I need to tell a team that they don't play after forming it. A 4x number of teams is the best (even number in each of the 2 groups).

Please notice my criteria for dual membership is that it does not cause conflicts among clubs. In practice, a player shall seek for approval on dual membership from his club, and his club is best to acknowledge other clubs about this (because an additional team might affect other's position). Some clubs clearly states dual membership is forbidden, and their players shall not attempt to have it.

In fact, few dual membership can be done without conflicts. Therefore, the difference between our views is just whether to totally forbit it or to let it reasonably exist.