how is the future of EE Communication in Singapore??
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 创业求职 | 本帖共有 10 楼,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  末页>>
作者:k-19 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:71) 发表:2005-06-24 17:08:42  楼主  关注此帖
how is the future of EE Communication in Singapore??
Put your OWN COOL signature here!
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:redk (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:264) 发表:2005-06-24 17:24:13  2楼
no future of EE communication here.
People here are too clear to program. They prefer to trade.
However, EE communication needs a lot of hw/sw engnieers doing something boring but necessary.
You can try China, India, or USA.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:君逆天 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:59) 发表:2005-06-25 00:05:17  3楼
no future of EE communication here.People here are too clear to program. They prefer to trade. However, EE communication needs a lot of hw/sw engnieers doing something boring but necessary. You can try China, India, or USA.
then what ee is popular here? thanks
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:redk (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:264) 发表:2005-06-25 00:47:04  4楼
then what ee is popular here? thanks
semiconductor is popular here.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:RMA (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:78) 发表:2005-06-25 02:55:04  5楼 评分:
i guess there are still oppotunities
got a few MNCs and local companies who need ppl specialized in comms. In fact many embedded system companies here r doing comms products, or at least needs it as module of their products.

it is somehow boring and needs a lot of experience, maybe tht's why not many ppl like. but with all the wireless, mobile and satellite products getting popular, good comms engineers will be well demanded. however, for companies doing system-level integration instead of complete in-house development, a 20-person project might only need 1 or 2 persons specilized in comms, as general knowledge will be enough for integration purpose. so it would be better if u have a good fundation of other aspects such as hardware or firmware design, and with comms as ur nich strength.

if u want to be a hardcore comms developer, then it is recommended for u to persue a phd. As far as i know, my fren's company did develop the entire wireless module, from RF hardware to baseband, in house. they got 2 or 3 phds with a few years of experience to handle the design. however, i guess very few companies here do in-house development of comms modules, so u gonna search hard. Plz correct me if you have better understanding of the industry.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:k-19 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:71) 发表:2005-06-26 00:04:07  6楼
那么semiconductor是指microelectronics中的那一项呢?
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:Update (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:56) 发表:2005-06-29 23:58:48  7楼
i guess there are still oppotunitiesgot a few MNCs and local companies who need ppl specialized in comms. In fact many embedded system companies here r doing comms products, or at least needs it as module of their products. it is somehow boring and needs a lot of experience, maybe tht's why not many ppl like. but with all the wireless, mobile and satellite products getting popular, good comms engineers will be well demanded. however, for companies doing system-level integration instead of complete in-house development, a 20-person project might only need 1 or 2 persons specilized in comms, as general knowledge will be enough for integration purpose. so it would be better if u have a good fundation of other aspects such as hardware or firmware design, and with comms as ur nich strength. if u want to be a hardcore comms developer, then it is recommended for u to persue a phd. As far as i know, my fren's company did develop the entire wireless module, from RF hardware to baseband, in house. they got 2 or 3 ph (more...)
pls advise...
1. what is complete in-house development?
2. "from RF hardware to baseband" is also system-level integration, right?
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:RMA (等级:3 - 略知一二,发帖:78) 发表:2005-07-01 14:41:57  8楼 评分:
pls advise...1. what is complete in-house development? 2. "from RF hardware to baseband" is also system-level integration, right?
answer
1. complete in-house development: in-house development is developing with the company's own R&D force, in contrast to outsourcing.

2. i'm referring to the development of each module itself.

欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:Update (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:56) 发表:2005-07-01 16:50:55  9楼
answer1. complete in-house development: in-house development is developing with the company's own R&D force, in contrast to outsourcing. 2. i'm referring to the development of each module itself.
Ur 1st point is right only when ...
Ur 1st point is right only when the chip development is also done by the company's own R&D forcce. If not, this kind of in-house development still belongs to system level integration. But I don't think 2 or 3 phds are enough for both chip development(IC design/fabrication/test) and system integration later on.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:Update (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:56) 发表:2005-07-01 16:54:40  10楼
Ur 1st point is right only when ...Ur 1st point is right only when the chip development is also done by the company's own R&D forcce. If not, this kind of in-house development still belongs to system level integration. But I don't think 2 or 3 phds are enough for both chip development(IC design/fabrication/test) and system integration later on.
add on:
2 or 3 phds maybe enough if they do not use any ICs in their design at all.
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 创业求职 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 10 篇文章,分 1 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码