会。谁照顾孩子这是一个事实问题。爸爸不着家，妈妈着家的话，法庭一定会考虑的。

贴段上次发的那个案子法官的原话：In respect of the indirect contributions, the Mother had been the primary caregiver of the two children up until 11 June 2015. She gave up her employment and assisted with her husband’s relocation, once to Hong Kong, and then subsequently to Singapore. Her view of their domestic life was one marked by the demands of long hours and travel that the Father’s employment necessitated. 最后一句是重点。和小孩无关的。

不太理解没孩子的家庭女方为何要做主妇？为了照顾家里老人？否则家里真的没有什么事情可以做啊……哎哟，跑偏了。

这段话的重点在法庭认为女方为婚姻做出了比较大的贡献，而不在有没有跟着老公到处跑。赡养费你想问什么？