trilinq的4卧大家认为租售比多少比较合适呢？附送户型图，扣除各种成本2.5%的回报率合理吗？纯讨论帖，非广告。该帖荣获当日十大第3，奖励楼主15分以及22华新币，时间：2017-01-20 22:00:03。
(more...)
新加坡10年国债利率2.37%，美国BBB债券差价1.63%，租售比4%比较合理。
新加坡10年国债利率2.37%，美国BBB债券差价1.63%，租售比4%比较合理。
顺便说一下IOI做出了我完全看不懂的决定，它们选择支付5100万新币的税款，同时把好卖的户型上调价格，已经不值得买了。我本以为它会在最后关头大减价的，我的contact级别太低了，完全接触不到核心的决策层。
再帮顶上十大。城市发展决定Nouvel 18捂盘，IOI自然跟随。
只是它家太也奢侈，居然不用PPS，而是直接交钱。
不一样吧？PPS只能省QC吧，IOI的这个是土地ABSD，有没有本地股东都是要交的。
PPS把全部剩下单位全买下，QC或ABSD全都可省
目测IOI之前没有做过PPS，在新加坡的项目也没城市发展多，觉得不想折腾。
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
是说IOI另外成立一家股份公司然后这家股份公司把IOI剩余单位都买下来吗。这样的话还是要交剩余单位15%+3%的购买税吧？而且这家股份公司买了这些剩余单位以后干什么呢？也许IOI应该学远东的Far East Hospitality Trust成立一个IOI Residensial Trust，然后由股东买单。附送Q5T的美图。估计IOI没有Far East那么厚的关系，找不到人批准，所以也没有办法把失败的投资转移到普通股民身上。
(more...)
貌似是CDL发行PPS把房子买下来，所有权不变，不需付3＋15%
This is a fixed-term instrument that provides investors both yield and capital gains play. One may expect any potential PPS exercise for the 48 apartments to be fashioned as a securitisation of the present and future cashflow from the apartments - just as CDL did for its maiden PPS in December 2014 for its Quayside Collection assets in Sentosa Cove (comprising unsold apartments of The Residences at W Singapore, a hotel and some retail space on the island) .
The vital thing to note is that under the PPS structure, there is no change in the properties' ownership, which remains with CDL for the duration of the structure; CDL also continues to manage the assets (including the leasing). Typically, the issuer will join its co-investors in the PPS structure; together, they hold the securities which have a five-year tenor and come with a fixed coupon, and stand to reap capital gains by divesting the properties if their value appreciates sufficiently at any point during the five-year duration of the securities.
If CDL were to divest the 48 apartments outright in the current market, it would not get the price it desires. Essentially, PPS allows the issuer to buy some time in the hope that prices will rise within the five-year period. Thus PPS provides a good solution for owners of prime residential assets to tide over the current soft market assuming one is confident the market will recover.
At entry point, the draw to investors of the PPS is that since there is no change in ownership of the apartments, the 3 per cent buyer's stamp duty and the 15 per cent additional buyer's stamp duty (ABSD) would not be payable on the PPS transaction price for the apartments. This would be especially appealing to foreign and corporate buyers, who have been put off from investing in the Singapore residential property sector as they have to pay the maximum 15 per cent ABSD rate on their purchase price.
来源：http://www.asiabuilders.com.sg/news/139207/pps-not-a-panacea-for-every-cdl-high-end-residential-project
The vital thing to note is that under the PPS structure, there is no change in the properties' ownership, which remains with CDL for the duration of the structure; CDL also continues to manage the assets (including the leasing). Typically, the issuer will join its co-investors in the PPS structure; together, they hold the securities which have a five-year tenor and come with a fixed coupon, and stand to reap capital gains by divesting the properties if their value appreciates sufficiently at any point during the five-year duration of the securities.
If CDL were to divest the 48 apartments outright in the current market, it would not get the price it desires. Essentially, PPS allows the issuer to buy some time in the hope that prices will rise within the five-year period. Thus PPS provides a good solution for owners of prime residential assets to tide over the current soft market assuming one is confident the market will recover.
At entry point, the draw to investors of the PPS is that since there is no change in ownership of the apartments, the 3 per cent buyer's stamp duty and the 15 per cent additional buyer's stamp duty (ABSD) would not be payable on the PPS transaction price for the apartments. This would be especially appealing to foreign and corporate buyers, who have been put off from investing in the Singapore residential property sector as they have to pay the maximum 15 per cent ABSD rate on their purchase price.
来源：http://www.asiabuilders.com.sg/news/139207/pps-not-a-panacea-for-every-cdl-high-end-residential-project
华新中文网致力于为新加坡留学生、工作人士及华人同胞提供交流空间和服务平台
关于我们┊ 广告服务┊ 联系方式┊ 华新博客┊ 经典怀旧┊ 投递作品
Huasing Association 1999 - 2013
