5:1,创记录有模有,南华2C阶段72人抢15个位, 电视还没报道,真弱!
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 家有儿女 | 本帖共有 78 楼,当前显示第 35 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:niumum (等级:6 - 驾轻就熟,发帖:5271) 发表:2013-08-03 21:36:50  35楼 
首先,如果整个家族都是校友的话对母校的重视和回馈母校的几率肯定比较高 然后,对于那些名校如南洋,校友都比较优秀,他们的孩子成为好学生的几率是不是比一般邻里孩子来的高呢?优秀的生源对学校维持地位和传统是很重要的。
indeed life is unequal
and you have to fight for your rights. no one owe you anything, the schools do not owe you a vacancy. if you find travelling time consuming, you can settle for a "lousier" school, no one forces you to squeeze your head into top schools.

the schools have their own interest to protect, for the very top schools, alumni parents are more likely to be supportive of the school and provide family environment condusive for producing good students. top schools are not black boxes that any input will givw you a good output, they ensure they have good output by taking in good input.

you are right about old money having more resources, and the government wants to counter that, that meritocracy cannot be jeopardized by eliticism, but would that be easily done? before that is achieved, you have to live with the fact that kids from privileged families have better resource and better chance of success, not because they are genetically superior.

as for my obvious reasons, i have explained in my oher posts, the government wont be so foolish to drive the property market crazy this way.

want to get into a certain school? marry an alumni/ staff, by all means.


---
系统生成:由于楼层数受限,本帖实际回复的是 爱游泳的鼠 的帖子 “I have not figured out your obvious reason for your argument.”
原地址:http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=179_12358732
[本文发送自华新iOS APP]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 78 楼,当前显示第 35 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码