5:1,创记录有模有,南华2C阶段72人抢15个位, 电视还没报道,真弱!
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 家有儿女 | 本帖共有 78 楼,当前显示第 71 楼 : 从楼主开始阅读 : 本帖树形列表 : 返回上一页
作者:niumum (等级:6 - 驾轻就熟,发帖:5271) 发表:2013-08-04 18:19:42  71楼 
首先,如果整个家族都是校友的话对母校的重视和回馈母校的几率肯定比较高 然后,对于那些名校如南洋,校友都比较优秀,他们的孩子成为好学生的几率是不是比一般邻里孩子来的高呢?优秀的生源对学校维持地位和传统是很重要的。
we are entitled to our own opinions about
the impact students' family background have on their eventual academic achievements, but personally i do not think that the extra resources top schools enjoy is the sole determining factor that leads to better results. giving alumni priority does not ensure but give a better chance of maintaining the school's quality.

i apologize if you took the sentence personally, as i was actually having the general herd instinct in mind when i said that, and well aware that you value convenience and time efficiency the most.

the whole argument about alumni identity stem from the post which said that no one cares if you are ex-NYPS, if you did not go on to the affiliated secondary schools. so i was trying to say being a top pri sch alumni does play a part, albeit a small one, in your personal status especially if you really did end up being an elite pure bred (rafflesian, for example). i have a pure bred rafflesian colleague in my dept, and she is viewed (subtlely) as more high class than other rjc alumni in the dept coz she has well to do and well educated parents who managed to start her off in RGPS. the whole point was about the VALUE of having a top primary school as alma mater.


---
系统生成:由于楼层数受限,本帖实际回复的是 snowflamingo 的帖子 “No, I don't agree that top PRIMARY schools produce better students”
原地址:http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=179_12359448
[本文发送自华新iOS APP]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表

本帖共有 78 楼,当前显示第 71 楼,本文还有 N-1 层楼,要不你试试看:点击此处阅读更多 >>



请登录后回复:帐号   密码