apologising after u have said hurtful things?Obviously your chess is not number one. Take a gd look at your own standard before you make unnessasary comments about other people's chess.
Some views
Reviewing all the comments of number001, he has made many personal attacks and mass attacks. Like what Mr 棋人生 has said, everybody has to be responsible for what they say in the forum.
He has made many absurd and totally groundless accusations on various parties, without getting the facts correct in the first place. Though he has indeed apologized, the damage is already done.
For example: number001 straightaway proclaims Lv RuiZhan as a KELONG player without getting his facts right first. This is a grave accusation on Lv Ruizhan. The tone of his language also leaves much to be desired. He DEMANDS AN EXPLANATION for that move, whereas a much better phrase to use would be: could anyone please advise me on how come Lv Ruizhan made this move for Move 44?I'm sure many readers would be willing to respond if he asked in a humble manner, instead of demanding. His choice of words is also extremely undesirable in many instances, and I will not list them for they are clear for all to see.
On many of his posts, he made direct attacks on the entire integrity of the competition, claiming that many in the competition are deliberately losing games to push one another up. He should gather and consolidate his facts and give the names to the organisers, instead of making such sweeping statements that attacks the entire lot of competitors.
He may think that hiding behind his computer and making accusations on other people is a good method, but number 001 could be subject to police and legal actions if he continues to disrespect others.
He has made many absurd and totally groundless accusations on various parties, without getting the facts correct in the first place. Though he has indeed apologized, the damage is already done.
For example: number001 straightaway proclaims Lv RuiZhan as a KELONG player without getting his facts right first. This is a grave accusation on Lv Ruizhan. The tone of his language also leaves much to be desired. He DEMANDS AN EXPLANATION for that move, whereas a much better phrase to use would be: could anyone please advise me on how come Lv Ruizhan made this move for Move 44?I'm sure many readers would be willing to respond if he asked in a humble manner, instead of demanding. His choice of words is also extremely undesirable in many instances, and I will not list them for they are clear for all to see.
On many of his posts, he made direct attacks on the entire integrity of the competition, claiming that many in the competition are deliberately losing games to push one another up. He should gather and consolidate his facts and give the names to the organisers, instead of making such sweeping statements that attacks the entire lot of competitors.
He may think that hiding behind his computer and making accusations on other people is a good method, but number 001 could be subject to police and legal actions if he continues to disrespect others.
Huasing Association 1999 - 2013