包干制制度的和棋方式(Law of TCC - Modification for Time ExchangeGame)简单的答案是看比赛的总裁判判决和决定。
这些年我也看过一些很奇怪的判决和决定。判决和决定似乎没把包干制的特性、赛制对棋手的影响和确保公平性考虑在内。同时也要确保不过，不管什么判决和决定，基本上只要同个比赛采取同类判决和决定就可以接受。如果没处理好就会成为Time Game，只看谁走的快。
前年，我向王兴南(AXF特级裁判，第一位在新加坡主持包干制赛事的裁判)反应了我对包干制的疑惑。 王的看法是包干制是一种复合现代忙碌棋友所采用的不寻常制度，所以需要不断改良确保公平、合理性。一般只有简明和棋和必胜局面才可判(下一步杀棋)。还有一些情况也可以和棋，不过细节我已忘了。
同年，我也向在新加坡主讲教练班的江苏言穆江老师讯问国内对包干制和棋的实行方法。一般只有简明和棋，有胜和定势的棋才可判。有至少多一兵的局面属无法判(因为不清楚这兵的潜力如何)。其它局面棋手走到时间用完为止。
我自己的做法是避免包干制。 赛事我采用以下几种方式
【1】Y秒内走一步，剩时不累计
这种听说在围棋有用过。我是以这个时间制来考验棋手的稳定性，让强手有所区别。不过这种钟昂贵，少于80新币还没见过，所以稍微 (more...)
case study 01: 2014 “佛光杯”全国小学个人赛
reference :
http://bbs.huasing.org/sForum/bbs.php?B=123_12784822
time control : 20m+00s
[A] Condition for draw request (by time tighted player - ):
A time tight player (with playing time close to 0, but not zero) can request the game to be declared drawn by the arbiter if the player has
(i) obvious/clear situational advantage (有明显优势) or
(ii) Standardised Drawn Scanario (正和局面)
Nomally, players have disputes over what constitutes obvious/clear situational advantage.
[B] Condition for draw request (by move limits - or Natural Draw 40/50/60 in TCC):
It is not mentioned if Natural Draw is allowed but normally for young students, for simplicity, it is not allowed to be used.
As mentioned, so long the same decision by the same ariter(preferred) using same logic, the tourney will be considered fair and the rules teated as acceptable.
Huasing Association 1999 - 2013