0. 文章另類是因為本人另類，不過文章的內容的認真也和本人同樣認真。長期尋GF并創業together是非常嚴肅的（literally), 直到找到為止。

1. 為什么尋GF并創業together呢？

因為本人系吉普賽丐幫投胎錯于今世，可今世非常不利于行乞。清朝及以前，憑一個討飯盂一條打狗棒，就可以集施舍之飯菜借寺院之屋頂流浪天下。緬甸現在也是如此，早上家家燒一大鍋飯，先拿出一半出去施舍給和尚。可惜緬甸長期visa拿不到啊。今天的世界早已改變，丐幫要重新定位，目標：尋GF并創業， 實現理想和自由。

2. 本人介紹

2.1懶： 懶得起床，懶得吃飯，懶得不得了。
2.2缺乏common sense: 基本不知道什么是sense, 因為sense不到。
2.3感覺遲鈍： 就是呆啊， 根本沒法和人交流。
2.4沒有組織： ANARCHIST, 丐幫的核心理念啊。

3. 對GF的期待（不敢講要求）

3.1她一定是非常有愛心了(要么怎么能照顧我這么懶的人）
3.2她可能非常強勢，不滿與the stereotype of women being week（因為不論是兩人關系還是創業，都是她在外，我再后支持了）
3.3她sense應該不錯，要么我們怎么get complementary
3.4她in early 20s, (我有ageism)

4.她和我的synergy和將來

這個，打個比方，如果她是上面的花，我就是下面的根（綠葉都不是），如果她要閑走走，我就是GPS. 具體細則，要她和我workout, and better keep it within her and me, lol.

如果你也有另類的潛質，有nomad in your heart, 不想一輩子unremarkably average的打工, 對我的提議有想法，請qq: 83546178.

謝謝.

要点是， 我认识并接受我的局限性，积极寻找互补。

那两个比喻，1）她出行我是GPS（GPS只是在某一方面作用很好）2）她开花我是根（根也是其貌不扬的支撑和补给水分）， 都说明了我的局限和supporting role， 在其中要心心相通就是更不可或缺的。说白了，我的角色和很多女人为了男人潜身幕后一心支持是一样的， 只是角色上是我在幕后支持一个想创业的女人。

謝謝提問并指出很多地方不嚴密，和英文的錯誤。我盡量回答。

1，第一段，literally怎么解释。

Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's Dictionary 5th Edition pointed out “You can use literally to emphasize a statement. Some careful speakers of English think that this use is incorrect.” [1]

2，1章 实现理想和自由，谁的理想和自由。

理想和自由是具有浓厚价值判断色彩的issues，這里我希望她和我share相當一部分的理想和自由.

3，2.4节 沒有組織： ANARCHIST是否是对没有组织的诠释，如果回答是肯定，那么没有组织这里的组织应该怎么解释，指代什么

Anarchism is a political philosophy encompassing theories and attitudes which consider the state, as compulsory government, to be unnecessary, harmful, and/or undesirable.[2]

我以為丐幫的核心理想是ANARCHISM.

4，3.2节，the stereotype of women being week？ week or weak? 然后是of前后的句子逻辑上怎么断句。我没太想明白。

Weak. My typo. 句子逻辑上怎么断句我也不明白，這個語法問題應該可以查到， 不過我這里懶了。

5，3.3，get complementary，complementary是形容词，这里应该用副词或者名词。

A few verbs, such as get, become, go, have, can precede an adjective, I think.

6，4章小标题，synergies。可数，复数。

我的錯誤。

7，4章第一段，workout是名词这里需要动词，而且主要意思是也不是弄出来，而是测试，检测，；within不恰当，个人觉得应该用between，楼主觉得呢？

你的說法更合適。

8，最后一段，人家心里面都有nomad（名词，牧民，云游者）了，哪里还有你嘛，醒醒吧。。。。

丐幫之所以為‘幫’，就是nomad可以一個人，也可>一人(nomads)， 呵呵呵.



Reference:

1. Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's Dictionary 5th Edition，HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.
2. ^ *Errico Malatesta, "Towards Anarchism", MAN!. Los Angeles: International Group of San Francisco. OCLC 3930443.
Agrell, Siri (2007-05-14). "Working for The Man". The Globe and Mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070514.wxlanarchist14/BNStory/lifeWork/home/. Retrieved on 2008-04-14.
o "Anarchism." Encyclopdia Britannica. 2006. Encyclopdia Britannica Premium Service. 29 August 2006
o "Anarchism." The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2005. P. 14 "Anarchism is the view that a society without the state, or government, is both possible and desirable."

你指出的對，

請問你怎么做到可以對語言，詞匯，和語法這么敏銳的？ 我寫paper就想要這一點， 我的問題是，第一我寫不出來，第二，寫出來錯誤連篇。

An excellent question，比例地說，我在上MBA entrepreneurship 課的時候碰到一種情形， 有的人談判協調能力非常強，比如我們辦一個start-up成了, 然后要賣出去了。賣家報價$10 million買我們的企業，她可以跟人家講到人家非常高興出$30 million，如果賣家報價$1 million買我們的企業，她可以跟人家講到人家非常高興出$3 million。但是她的弱勢是她不知道我們企業對于什么人值多少錢，什么時候可以低價賣，什么時候可以高價賣，為什么。因為中間需要很多分析，直覺，策略。這些幕后工作不做好也會出現問題，我在這方面比較適合。我也會認真做幕后工作，做黑臉的工作也行。不過要我做前臺，賣家報價$10 million，我不但提不上去，可能最后$1 million買了人家還以為我占了便宜， walamaa! 這個是我的弱點。\n\n我們那時一個香港人，把vc等等騙得團團轉，不過finance一較真，問盈利計算中為什么用某些值，他就要我先跟他算好，解釋清楚各種scenario的probability, outcome, and etc. 不過我要控制自己不要沖到前臺，而要為他思考好一些，之前替她準備好讓他應對。她呢不止前臺風光，也要把個方面意見帶回來，我們分析思考。\n\n總之，我的優勢在于直覺，公開，膽大。這些對創業也是有很大必須性的。要變英文了，專業的中文實在說不轉。\n\nOne of the most important skills an entrepreneur can have is the ability to predict change and act on it. Predicting change is extremely hard in general, but there are some changes that are identifiable to someone who is inquisitive and keeps his mind open. For example, one quick way to predict change is to see what has happened in the developed Japan, which may be happening right now in the almost-developed Korea, and will probably happen some time in the developing China. Nevertheless, not everything that happened in Japan will happen in China, and even it does happen, it will probably happen not in the same way. To distinguish the pearls from sands, analysis of the context and the fundamental driven forces in such cases are critically important. \n\nThat’s just one simple example of the contributions I can make. I will probably stop here and not let my thought going too far. Somehow it is an open question whether this post can really help me in finding someone who wants to lead a start-up and wants me as the back engine of the start-up.\n\nCheers.\n丐可丐非常丐

An excellent question，比例地說，我在上MBA entrepreneurship 課的時候碰到一種情形， 有的人談判協調能力非常強，比如我們辦一個start-up成了, 然后要賣出去了。賣家報價$10 million買我們的企業，她可以跟人家講到人家非常高興出$30 million，如果賣家報價$1 million買我們的企業，她可以跟人家講到人家非常高興出$3 million。但是她的弱勢是她不知道我們企業對于什么人值多少錢，什么時候可以低價賣，什么時候可以高價賣，為什么。因為中間需要很多分析，直覺，策略。這些幕后工作不做好也會出現問題，我在這方面比較適合。我也會認真做幕后工作，做黑臉的工作也行。不過要我做前臺，賣家報價$10 million，我不但提不上去，可能最后$1 million買了人家還以為我占了便宜， walamaa! 這個是我的弱點。

我們那時一個香港人，把vc等等騙得團團轉，不過finance一較真，問盈利計算中為什么用某些值，他就要我先跟他算好，解釋清楚各種scenario的probability, outcome, and etc. 不過我要控制自己不要沖到前臺，而要為他思考好一些，之前替她準備好讓他應對。她呢不止前臺風光，也要把個方面意見帶回來，我們分析思考。

總之，我的優勢在于直覺，公開，膽大。這些對創業也是有很大必須性的。要變英文了，專業的中文實在說不轉。

One of the most important skills an entrepreneur can have is the ability to predict change and act on it. Predicting change is extremely hard in general, but there are some changes that are identifiable to someone who is inquisitive and keeps his mind open. For example, one quick way to predict change is to see what has happened in the developed Japan, which may be happening right now in the almost-developed Korea, and will probably happen some time in the developing China. Nevertheless, not everything that happened in Japan will happen in China, and even it does happen, it will probably happen not in the same way. To distinguish the pearls from sands, analysis of the context and the fundamental driven forces in such cases are critically important.

That’s just one simple example of the contributions I can make. I will probably stop here and not let my thought going too far. Somehow it is an open question whether this post can really help me in finding someone who wants to lead a start-up and wants me as the back engine of the start-up.

Cheers.
丐可丐非常丐

In my life I’ve made many mistakes; of course I’ve had successes too, however I’ve only recently come to the phase of addressing limitations through others. Everyone has his/her limitations. Working on everyone's own limitations is for sure beneficial. Some people can just amaze me in their ability to grow beyond themselves perennially. For most of us, we cannot go beyond ourselves that easily. But there are also several other aspects of addressing limitations. One of which is to find people who are strong in areas that you are limited.

First, for me, it helps to get a partner that "能忽悠" or talk like G.W.Bush. LOL. I just cannot make myself sound interesting.

Second, I think it provides you critical leverage in start-up if you get a VC as bf. However, VC do not want entrepreneurs as their partners in general. That does not prohibit you from getting a relationship with a VC, but it does not give you the chance of growing something from nothing with your beloved partner.

In fact, I do not care whether she is a VC. I do not look at her position, job, or money. To me, the only important thing is to grow something from nothing with a beloved partner.

我实在是没见过没有任何分析，直覺，策略能力的人会有很强的谈判协调能力 特别是直觉和策略能力 你以为是拍电视还是写yy小说呢忽悠忽悠就行了?

--忽悠这个词比较贬义，用的是过了一些。谈判协调能力更适合，和忽悠的共同点是：要能找出别人的需要，说到点子上。不是无边无际的。


还有你到底是 "我的優勢在于直覺，公開，膽大" 还是 "2.3感覺遲鈍： 就是呆啊， 根本沒法和人交流"呢？

--一个是优点，一个是弱点


另外说点废话

"One of the most important skills an entrepreneur can have is the ability to predict change and act on it." 这话我觉得你理解的有点误会 predict change是很容易的...时间越长的趋势越容易预测...怎么样act on it / timing 才是难的部分...仔细想想你身边就知道了 高谈阔论的人很多 真正做出什么事情的却少很多...基本原因也在于此....从你对你quote的那句话的解释 我看你太关注于趋势上的判断了 或者说 太关注于表面的东西...看你好像挺专注于创业的 你如果当我是来找碴的就算了 不然就当是个建议 自己斟酌


--我非常同意“怎么样act on it / timing 才是难的部分”， 我在这里只是浅浅的开了一点头，因为我发现大多数人到这个版来八卦，就没有向下讲到“怎么样act on it / timing”， 其实这些也不是在这种论坛上讨论的了。

也许我是错的，我也希望我是错的，现在我的感觉是SM中即将/新近毕业的认识到创业的好处不多（不算开个小店没有scalability那种）。话说回来，当然永远都是大部分人要的是打工过日子， 而一少撮人部分人要有自己的事业做， 所以我慢慢寻找了。

是不是concentrate yourself on* 更常用呢？