金管局房产措施回顾(共勉)
登录 | 论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 房产车市 | 本帖共有 22 楼,分 2 页, 当前显示第 1 页 : 本帖树形列表 : 刷新 : 返回上一页
<<始页  [1]  2    末页>>
作者:滚雪球 (等级:11 - 出神入化,发帖:11187) 发表:2019-06-11 21:43:46  楼主  关注此帖
金管局房产措施回顾(共勉)
In December 2006, buyer stamp duty concession was withdrawn and all property buyers had to pay their stamp duties within 14 days of the date of excising their purchase options. During the transition period, buyers who execute their purchase transactions during the month had a three month’s grace period to pay their stamp duty.

In October 2007, a Deferred Payment Scheme introduced by developers, which allowed buyers to defer payments for properties under construction to the date of issue of Temporary Occupation Permit, was disallowed by the government.

In September 2009, an Interest Absorption Scheme introduced by developers, which allowed buyers to transfer their interest-servicing burden on a housing loan to the developers for properties under construction until the completion date, and Interest-only housing loan scheme, which allowed buyers to make only interest payments on their housing loans, were disallowed by the government.

In February 2010, seller stamp duty was re-introduced for the sale of properties within one year of purchase and LTV ratio was lowered back to 80%.

In August 2010, the holding period for seller stamp duty was increased to three years. For borrowers with existing housing loan(s), their LTV ratio was lowered to 70% and the minimum cash-component down-payment was raised to 10% from 5%.

In January 2011, the holding period for seller stamp duty was increased to four years and seller stamp duty rate was increased to 16%, 12%, 8% and 4% for properties sold in the first, second, third, and fourth year, respectively. For borrowers with existing housing loan(s), their LTV ratio was lowered to 60%.

In December 2011, additional buyer stamp duty was imposed; Singapore citizens buying their third and subsequent residential property pay 3%, Singapore permanent residents buying their second and subsequent residential property pay 3%, and foreigners buying their first and subsequent residential property pay 10%.

In October 2012, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) imposed a 35-year tenor restriction for housing loans on new residential properties. LTV ratio was lowered to 60% for borrowers without any existing housing loan(s) but loan tenors exceed 30-year or extend beyond borrowers’ retirement age of 65 years. LTV ratio was lowered to 40% for borrowers with existing housing loan(s) where the loan tenors exceed 30-year or extend beyond borrowers’ retirement age of 65 years.

In January 2013, additional buyer stamp duty was raised; Singapore citizens buying their second residential property pay 7% and those buying their third and subsequent residential property pay 10%, Singapore permanent residents buying their first residential property pay 5% and those buying their second and subsequent residential property pay 10%, and foreigners buying their first and subsequent residential property pay 15%.
LTV ratio was lowered to 50% and 40% for borrowers applying for their second and third or subsequent housing loan, respectively where loan tenors do not exceed 30-year or do not extend beyond borrowers’ retirement age of 65 years. In cases where loan tenors exceed 30-year or extend beyond borrowers’ retirement age of 65 years, LTV ratios of 30% and 20% apply for borrowers applying for their second and third or subsequent housing loan, respectively. The minimum cash-component down-payment was also raised to 25% from 10% for buyers taking their second or subsequent housing loan.

In June 2013, The MAS introduced the Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR) for homebuyers with the intention that the measure “...will help strengthen credit underwriting practices by [financial institutions, FIs] and encourage financial prudence among borrowers.” The TDSR is the total monthly debt service as a percentage of the borrower’s income and is capped at 60%. In computation of TDSR, FIs will need to take into account the monthly repayment for the property loan that the borrower is applying for plus the monthly repayments on all other outstanding property and non-property debt obligations of the borrower; apply a specified medium-term interest rate or the prevailing market interest rate, whichever is higher, to the property loan that the borrower is applying for when calculating the TDSR; apply a haircut of at least 30% to all variable income (e.g. bonuses) and rental income; and apply haircuts to and amortize the value of any eligible financial assets taken into consideration in assessing the borrower’s debt servicing ability in order to convert them into ”income streams”. MAS also required borrowers on a property loan to be the mortgagors of the residential property for which the loan is taken; “guarantors” who are standing guarantee for borrowers otherwise assessed by the FI at the point of application for the housing loan not to meet the TDSR threshold for a property loan to be brought in as co-borrowers; and in the case of joint borrowers, that FIs use the income-weighted average age of borrowers when applying the rules on loan tenure.

Effective August 27, 2013, new Singapore permanent residents have to wait for 3 years before they are eligible to purchase resale HDB flats.

In July 2018, The Government announces adjustments to the Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty (ABSD) rates and Loan-to-Value (LTV) limits on residential property purchases. The current ABSD rates for Singapore Citizens (SC) and Singapore Permanent Residents (SPR) purchasing their first residential property will be retained at 0% and 5% respectively. Raise ABSD by 5%-points for all other individuals; Raise ABSD by 10%-points for entities; and Introduce an additional ABSD of 5% that is non-remittable under the Remission Rules1 (payable on the purchase price or market value, as applicable) for developers purchasing residential properties for housing development. LTV limits will be tightened by 5%-points for all housing loans granted by financial institutions. These revised LTV limits do not apply to loans granted by HDB.
---
该帖荣获当日十大第1,奖励楼主25分以及37华新币,时间:2019-06-12 22:00:01。
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:我是老万 (等级:7 - 出类拔萃,发帖:1524) 发表:2019-06-12 08:46:29  2楼
沙发
继续加码
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:凡人 (等级:15 - 最接近神,发帖:20668) 发表:2019-06-12 09:48:02  3楼
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:A星星 (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:71) 发表:2019-06-12 09:56:47  4楼
家长式政府
逆市操作,全世界放水,新加坡调控不断升级
给政府个赞,(其实还是怕疯涨引起社会问题影响选票和管制)
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:微蓝 (等级:4 - 马马虎虎,发帖:1269) 发表:2019-06-12 10:15:44  5楼
我们算了下,从2009年到现在房价翻了一倍。
当然除了房价增长,还有各种税,以及对PR二套房的现在。
真的是生不逢时啊。。还有晚婚的代价!
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:微蓝 (等级:4 - 马马虎虎,发帖:1269) 发表:2019-06-12 10:22:04  6楼
我们算了下,从2009年到现在房价翻了一倍。当然除了房价增长,还有各种税,以及对PR二套房的现在。 真的是生不逢时啊。。还有晚婚的代价!
对PR买二套房的限制。
还有MOP的限制。明明可以买但得等满5年啊
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:helloabc (等级:1 - 微不足道,发帖:561) 发表:2019-06-12 10:36:10  7楼
个人的一点看法
从大方向来说,政府调控没毛病。居者有其屋,是社会和谐的基础。负面典型就是香港。还有一个更大的负面典型大家都懂的。

但是,pr 3年后才能买hdb,这个政策我觉得很不合理。既然政府已经给了pr,那人家就是要长期居住生活的,3年的限制,毫无道理。这政策,既对pr不利,对公民卖家也不利。没有人从这个政策受益。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:redk (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:264) 发表:2019-06-12 10:53:09  8楼
个人的一点看法从大方向来说,政府调控没毛病。居者有其屋,是社会和谐的基础。负面典型就是香港。还有一个更大的负面典型大家都懂的。 但是,pr 3年后才能买hdb,这个政策我觉得很不合理。既然政府已经给了pr,那人家就是要长期居住生活的,3年的限制,毫无道理。这政策,既对pr不利,对公民卖家也不利。没有人从这个政策受益。
对公民买家有利
都是短视的
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:love962397 (等级:13 - 举世无双,发帖:9419) 发表:2019-06-12 12:22:03  9楼
雪球兄已经正式装行做经纪啦?
小毛驴自己
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:功夫熊猫 (等级:?? - 无法无天,发帖:73612) 发表:2019-06-12 13:15:25  10楼
个人的一点看法从大方向来说,政府调控没毛病。居者有其屋,是社会和谐的基础。负面典型就是香港。还有一个更大的负面典型大家都懂的。 但是,pr 3年后才能买hdb,这个政策我觉得很不合理。既然政府已经给了pr,那人家就是要长期居住生活的,3年的限制,毫无道理。这政策,既对pr不利,对公民卖家也不利。没有人从这个政策受益。
还不是因为一部分人滥用了福利吗
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:功夫熊猫 (等级:?? - 无法无天,发帖:73612) 发表:2019-06-12 13:16:08  11楼
对公民买家有利都是短视的
不对公民买家有利的算啥呢?高瞻远瞩?
目测撕逼大战一触即发
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:滚雪球 (等级:11 - 出神入化,发帖:11187) 发表:2019-06-12 13:44:30  12楼
雪球兄已经正式装行做经纪啦?小毛驴自己
没有啊
经济会关心很久以前的政策吗?哪有像我这么academic的,早就饿死了
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:redk (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:264) 发表:2019-06-12 14:52:05  13楼
不对公民买家有利的算啥呢?高瞻远瞩?目测撕逼大战一触即发
这个最大的弊病之一
已损害PR利益为代价来迎合公民
要是盘子不够分,大可以不批那么多PR啊
这样以来结果是PR含金量下降而已
头痛医头脚痛医脚,短视短视还是短视
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:helloabc (等级:1 - 微不足道,发帖:561) 发表:2019-06-12 15:05:10  14楼
这个最大的弊病之一已损害PR利益为代价来迎合公民 要是盘子不够分,大可以不批那么多PR啊 这样以来结果是PR含金量下降而已 头痛医头脚痛医脚,短视短视还是短视
病急乱投医
08年左右放进来太多的人,导致本地公民强烈不满,坑一下pr,是政治正确。
关键问题是,坑了pr,公民也没见得到什么好处。hdb涨幅被控制,是增加供给的原因,而不是打压pr。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:功夫熊猫 (等级:?? - 无法无天,发帖:73612) 发表:2019-06-12 16:48:58  15楼
这个最大的弊病之一已损害PR利益为代价来迎合公民 要是盘子不够分,大可以不批那么多PR啊 这样以来结果是PR含金量下降而已 头痛医头脚痛医脚,短视短视还是短视
层主得先证明为什么pr和公民必须相同待遇呢?
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:redk (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:264) 发表:2019-06-12 17:04:33  16楼
层主得先证明为什么pr和公民必须相同待遇呢?
诚信
人家加入PR的时候就是看好你的福利,
政策一天一改,久而久之就没有诚信了。
一个没有自然资源的地方,如果没有吸引人来的东西来,失去的更多。
另外,我是公民,所以我没有刻意偏袒PR。
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:helloabc (等级:1 - 微不足道,发帖:561) 发表:2019-06-12 17:04:42  17楼
层主得先证明为什么pr和公民必须相同待遇呢?
没有要求相同待遇呀
pr只能买resale。关键问题是,既然都已经是permanent resident了,总要有个住的地方吧。要么干脆规定pr不能买hdb,要么就允许拿到pr就可以买,等3年的意义是?
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:shaokunlun (等级:10 - 炉火纯青,发帖:7519) 发表:2019-06-12 18:15:37  18楼
没有要求相同待遇呀pr只能买resale。关键问题是,既然都已经是permanent resident了,总要有个住的地方吧。要么干脆规定pr不能买hdb,要么就允许拿到pr就可以买,等3年的意义是?
强迫你申请公民
pr和公民待遇要有区别
[本文发送自华新手机Wap版]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:DonnieMum (等级:2 - 初出茅庐,发帖:708) 发表:2019-06-12 19:16:52  19楼
对PR买二套房的限制。还有MOP的限制。明明可以买但得等满5年啊
PR MOP满了也不能买二套吧
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
作者:ybhcd (等级:4 - 马马虎虎,发帖:1192) 发表:2019-06-12 19:31:21  20楼
顺着这个时间轴看蔡裕林的时评
才能了解这些政策当时的前因后果
[本文发送自华新iOS App]
欢迎来到华新中文网,踊跃发帖是支持我们的最好方法!原文 / 传统版 / WAP版只看此人从这里展开收起列表
论坛导航 -> 华新鲜事 -> 房产车市 | 返回上一页 | 本主题共有 22 篇文章,分 2 页, 当前显示第 1 页 | 回到顶部
<<始页  [1]  2  末页>>

请登录后回复:帐号   密码